Skip to main content
Topic: I really HATE the 2.3 !! (Read 25566 times) previous topic - next topic

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #180
Quote from: martin0660;200879
EXACTLY. The auxilary shaft is just fine as long as its installed right in the first place, doesnt have the extra load of high volume or high pressure pumps, or SAE 50 weight oil.



Again, for some reason you think you know my junk. I have been running a wideband on mine for the last two seasons. It confirmed a lot of what I am/was doing as right, also exposed why some things worked like they did for me. With Tweecer, a wideband and my Innovate datalogging, I pretty much know whats going on. What would surprise everyone is knowing how close to stock my junk really is.



Indeed I have a little experience with this junk. It's my fasination, it keeps me into racing. I can assure you, a 347 would be easier, but it really  those guys off when a 2.3, 5 speed, street driven cars takes them out heads up, let alone bracket racing. I can assure you, I would have lost interest a long time ago with a windsor based engine, but thats just me.

/rant / BTW - Frank is friend of mine, and will help him any way possible, but...... I WILL NOT, nor have I, done it for him. I try and keep him on the right path, but its his deal, and I'm making him learn the way I did. It actually gets frustrating to sit back and watch him learn (and make mistakes) but I can assure you, if I'm not around any more, he will know how to make his junk run too. I geuss I dont want everyone to think Franks stuff is my doing. /end rant/



You are correct. I have only ever run T3's, sometimes there might be an IHI on there when I'm in between JY turbo's. As Mike likes to point out, I've fragged quite a few of them, but all of them where junk yard parts with unknown history. Hell, i've put them on, and broke them within an hour trying to set the boost :D Since i bought a rebuild with 360 bearing and good parts, its been bulletproof.

Bob Myers



lol just to be a ball buster like this one bob!
RIP 1988 and 1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
I welcomed the dark side and currently am driving a 2000 Dodge Durango SLT plus, with a 5.9, Code named project "Night Runner"
Shes black on black, fully loaded, with headers, 180 tstat, e fan, straight exhaust into a cherry bomb vortex ler, full tune up, ported intake and T/B, MSD coil, and round aircleaner.
Mods to come: Fully rebuilt and heavily modded 46RE, and a richmond rachet locker.
my $300 beater ;)
R.I.P Kayleigh Raposa 12/18/90 - 2/24/07

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #181
but seriously guys if your gonna dispute the engines fine, Stop with the personal shots. Its the freaking internet....
RIP 1988 and 1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
I welcomed the dark side and currently am driving a 2000 Dodge Durango SLT plus, with a 5.9, Code named project "Night Runner"
Shes black on black, fully loaded, with headers, 180 tstat, e fan, straight exhaust into a cherry bomb vortex ler, full tune up, ported intake and T/B, MSD coil, and round aircleaner.
Mods to come: Fully rebuilt and heavily modded 46RE, and a richmond rachet locker.
my $300 beater ;)
R.I.P Kayleigh Raposa 12/18/90 - 2/24/07

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #182
Quote from: Aerobird Motorsports;200882
Bob, We're talking about your TC, which never ran a WB to your own claim. The Capri is not in this conversation *sigh*.



When I initially broght Bob into this several posts back saying
I knew about a well over 300hp 2.3, I was not talking about his TC, I was meaning the Capri. I can vouch fo rthe fact that the Capri could run without the Tweecer in it. That is pretty much the SAME setup that his TC was!! Just a big front mount now and a few other SMALL odds and ends.....





Quote from: martin0660;200320
Frank was talking about my old TC and current Capri combo. Both cars where (TC) and are (Capri) daily drivers, ......... Anyone that has seen my cars at the track knows I drive them like rental cars, Neither ever left me stuck aywhere on the street, and I would (and have) driven either of them anywhere.

I can assure you, I've got nothing to prove to anyone.

Bob Myers


He is not hiding a thing, its what he says it is. A daily driven, 12 sec ride with no dyno time. For what it is, I would consider it rather reliable!!
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/665379

1983 TurboCoupe-T3 .60/.63, 3" exhaust, Motorsport front mount, PJ, large VAM, green tops, 8.8" w/ 3.55's, 13.72@97mph
1985.5 SVO
1984 Fullsize Bronco- 300, NP435

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #183
Quote from: Aerobird Motorsports;200882
Bob, We're talking about your TC, which never ran a WB to your own claim. The Capri is not in this conversation *sigh*.


I thought the conversation was about the 2.3 turbo.

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #184
Quote from: oldraven;200932
I thought the conversation was about the 2.3 turbo.


It is.....
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #185
I don't know anything about his Capri so I was speaking about his TC. If his Capri is sorted with the Tweecer/etc and goes faster then the baseline TC engine setup all the better. All I've heard about the Capri was a serious of JY T3's blew, a shortblock blew, and then when it all got buttoned back up something happened to the rear axle. Last I heard it still hasn't gone any faster then the "baseline" setup, though the tracks are closed ;)

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #186




dayum 19 pages of this stuff???
And guys complain that women have drama! :rollin:
:cougarsmily:~Karen~

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #187
It's snowing, there's only 1 football game left, the tracks are closed, and we have to have something to talk about! :D

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #188
Quote from: LittleAngel1198;200975




dayum 19 pages of this stuff???
And guys complain that women have drama! :rollin:




your calling a technical thread about two different engines drama?  So what's your experience on either of these engines.... good or bad?:hick: :shakeass:

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #189
Quote
your calling a technical thread about two different engines drama? So what's your experience on either of these engines.... good or bad?

No, I'm calling the bitching about which one is better and who knows more about each of them "drama".
The discussion about the engines is cool, however, the name calling, the ''you don't know anything because of your age" stuff is BS.  There are 19 pages of the same thing being said over and over again..... drama.

Now, RJ don't be hatin'! ;)
:cougarsmily:~Karen~

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #190
Quote from: LittleAngel1198;200985
There are 19 pages of the same thing being said over and over again..... drama.

Now, RJ don't be hatin'! ;)


yeah that the 2.3 sucks...

I aint hating...  its a fact.. ;):shakeass:

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #191
 it i don't want to hear it project Twin Turbo TC coming sometime the year or next. I want a new project and i will have a V8 for a DD if the TC breaks down.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


http://www.cardomain.com/id/Carpimp1987
1987 T-Bird AEROBIRD-GT had many many mods but is now totaled and is the car that made me want to start customizing everything all over again.
1988 T-Bird 5.0 HO DD/Sleeper/next project car :birdsmily:
1988 Cougar XR7 5.0 HO Vortech Supercharged being bulit right now :cougarsmily:


I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #192
Quote from: 1WLD BRD;201122
yeah that the 2.3 sucks...

I aint hating...  its a fact.. ;):shakeass:


Well, the compressor side of the turbo sucks. That's how they work. The air has to come from somewhere. Sheesh.

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #193
:shakeass:

I really HATE the 2.3 !!

Reply #194
Quote from: oldraven;201135
Well, the compressor side of the turbo sucks. That's how they work. The air has to come from somewhere. Sheesh.


Best. Explanation. EVER. :hick: