I really HATE the 2.3 !!
Reply #154 –
Yeah, and I disagree with them on that probably, because the wideband is tuning for the masses and I think it's the way to go now. Bob has tons of experience. Frank has gleaned a lot from Bob so that explains that. In the days before widebands we had EGT which was not a substitute but could keep you from "melting the mill", also reading the plugs, which some people still stand by if you know how to do it well. Bob also has only used T3 turbos to my knowledge and has managed to go amazingly fast with it. With a T3 and jacked fuel pressure, yeah the stock fuel management can work. Get into 50 trim territory and really crank it up and you need to rethink your whole engine management system. I love standalones, they make life so easy and change the way the engine works so dramatically.
I don't have positive things to show for all the different work I've done, the pieces have never fallen quite right for me and I have other obligations, but I know the ins and outs and problems with these engines and can honestly say I've examined lots of other options and still consider the 2.3T one of my favorites, the only other thing by Ford I'd consider going with is the 4.6 DOHC for any current projects of mine, and even that I wish I could do turbocharged but it's quite expensive.
I'll be honest and say a stock TC engine isn't all that impressive, it has a big torque hit and then instantly chokes. My first ride in my white TC was with an engine I rebuilt and prepped the way I thought was best and it made all the difference over the stock TC (as I got to drive one later). It's easy to poke fun at a stock TC's times and forget just how big of a difference the intake, exhaust, extra boost makes, but also I went farther and did porting and a cam, and that truly made all the difference. Unless you do a big valve ported head, the stock ranger cam just doesn't cut it, it's lame.