Skip to main content
Topic: Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much? (Read 5647 times) previous topic - next topic

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Please understand I love my 86 Cougar. But in 89 when the next gen T-Birds/Cougars came out I remember how much nicer they were to drive (longer wheel base, better ride, more horsepower, etc.) than the Fox body cars. Or do you like the 10th gen T-Birds/Cougars (89-97) just as much as the Fox body cars?

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #1
Foxbody is best body but besides that they look wayyyy better and actually has an aftermarket
88 Cougar
88 T-Bird
other cars that don't apply to this forum

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #2
A fox body cougar was my first car (the one on the left in my signature). Something about them always feels like "home" to me. I know they aren't the fastest or the best looking cars out there, but they just feel right to me.

I have only owned one 89 Cougar, and one 93 Lincoln Mark VIII (similar), and I don't know, they just didn't "do it" for me.

As was mentioned, I like the plentiful fox-chassis parts too. Body parts are getting -hard to find around here though. To be fair, the MN-12 bodies are just as extinct in junk yards here too.

I've had umpteen fox bodies in my life. I like them all, really. But I'll probably always have a fox-cougar in my life, lol. My dad bought an 84 Turbo in 1987 (which would eventually be handed-down to me as my first car), and there has only been about 6 months total time since then that I haven't had a fox body cougar in the driveway, lol.
CoogarXR : 1985 Cougar XR-7

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #3
I always liked to be the odd guy. When I started racing,everyone would build a Chevy. Parts for them were dime a dozen. You could always find used manifolds,cams and heads where Ford stuff was scarse. When I turned good numbers from a limited selection of parts, I got more respect than the other guys.
As far as my Cougar goes, how many stangs do you see? Now, how many Cougars /T Birds do you see? When I go to a cruise night,I get a great sense of satisfaction with the interest people show as compared to all the other Fox Stangs. Don't get me wrong, I respect the Stangs as well as all other Fords........I just like to be different.
84 COUGAR/90 HO, 1.7RRs, performer RPM,700DP, equal length shorties, stainless EXH ,T-5,Hurst pro-billet, KC clutch, 8.8/ 4.10s, line-lok, bla ,bla, bla.
71 COMET/289,351w heads, 12.5 TRWs, 750DP, Liberty TL, 9"/6.00s, 11.9x @112 , bla,bla,bla.

Never shoot your mouth off, unless your brain is loaded! ....I may get older, but I'll never grow up!....If you're not laughing, you're not living!  :laughing:

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #4
Just love the style, handling, comfort and stance of my '86 XR-7 and I think more people are starting to appreciate and admire them all the time.  It's a rare day now that I don't have people coming over and wanting to look her over when I'm out and about.  Funny thing is, I drive her every day so she's just my 'baby,' not a 31 year old car that may be turning into something of a classic!!  I still think of her as being around 10 or 12 :O
1986 Mercury Cougar XR-7 Turbo-charged 5-speed.
Owned 22 years.

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #5
My first car was a $110 impound my dad bought for parts. After it sat for a while i fixed it up and got it street legal. 14 or so years ago when i first started driving, these cars were everywhere out here. Now they are drying up. Lots can be had "not running, dont know whats wrong with it". 10 minutes of work usually gets em back on the road.

I have had 15 total 83-88 tbirds and cougars now, currently own 4.

My 86 cougar is basically a parts car, all worn out with 350k miles on it and a badly rusted body with old body work that wasn't done right. For $500, i drove it for 3 or 4 years, put about 60k miles on it. Still runs good, but has a hole in the oil pan from the sway bar and front suspension is trashed.

My 88xr7, guy that had it before me ghetto rigged everything and ruined it. Ive fixed most things, it runs and drives but the tranny was shot and only has a slipping 1st gear and reverse. It might get my 86's tranny or i might throw a t-5 in it. Havent decided yet. Manual pedals are over $100 in bad condition now a days.

My 86 tbird, guy was asking $700, bought it for $520. Had 134k miles, has about 148k now. Good car, was reasonably taken care of, but has a big quarter panel dent behind the passenger door.

My 83 v-6 cougar. I watched this in the classifieds locally for almost a year. Ended up only needing a battery. Ifs parked at my buddies house, he uses it as a second car to get to and from work. Has about 130k miles on it, just needs a head liner and power windows fixed. Runs and drives really good, as well as being my first ever carbed car. Body is pretty good with faded paint. Toying with the idea of a carbed 302 swap. Was a steal at $300.

I like these cars alot. Being 6'5, just a bit more head room then most cars. I like beaters basically, i dont want a show car to polish and only take to car shows. I want something cheap and easy to fix, but reliable enough id trust it to go anywhere.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #6
I have always been a Foxbody guy,grew up with them. I also love the not so common vehicles that always seem to strike up a conversation. I daily drove a XR4Ti, 2.3t 87 Ranger beat up farm truck, 1970 Torino wagon and a lifted Bronco2 bigger than some full size trucks. I have tried two other times in the past to find a clean Tbird but its been hard up here in Michigan.  When I found my 83 I had to jump on it since it was a clean Florida car with low mileage.  And since Im over 6ft tall and 300lbs these cars just fit me better than the Mustangs I grew up on.
  Funny thing is Im surprised how many people I run into that dont even know what my car is. I have had guys ask me what year my Mustang is, been asked if it was a Fairmont and just asked WTF is it!
Brian R.
88 2.3t Ranger
83 TC  gt40p motor,Vortech,TFS1 cam,long tubes,MS PnP,T5,8.8,17x9 Cobra 17s

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #7
After the first overhaul of my '83 (1998) I was out on the local cruise and a guy ask me what year my car was and then he offered up '94 or '95.  When I told him is was an '83 he just stood there and then told me I was BS'n him.  One of my buddies came over and walked him around to the front of the car and when he saw the four head lights it hit him.  Most of the Mustang crowd won't pay the car any attention until I start it and then rattle rattle here come the cattle.

Story behind my '83 is my dad bought it new and its never left the family nor will it ever unless some jackass offers me too much money to pass up but I don't think that will ever happen.

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #8
My first two cars were birds of an entirely different feather. #1 was a 1978 Trans Am powered by a '70 LT1, fantastic power but in very poor condition. #2 was a 1980 Formula Firebird, powered by a 301, mint body but really, really slow. There was also a 66 Galaxie 500 in between those two but it was never a daily driver (It was mint and powered by a 390, but too hard on gas for my high school finances). One day, when I was starting to get bored with the Formula, I saw a white 1984 T-Bird in a used car lot (this was circa 1991). I was smitten. I took it out for a drive and fell in love with it. The used car lot tried to stiff me on the trade in value of the Formula (they offered $800) so I drove away in my Firebird. I was now determined to own a Thunderbird. At the time I paid little attention to "newer" cars, so I didn't know much about them. The internet did not exist so research was not easy, but eventually I found out that 83-86 looked the same and that the Cougars were similar. Didn't know the nuances between the model years yet, but I knew enough to know I wanted one. I sold the Firebird privately for $2500 and immediately started looking. That white one was long gone, so I picked up the local "Bargain Hunter" and started calling. I was only sure of one thing: Unlike the two Firebirds and the Galaxie I was not going to buy the first car I looked at. First came a light sage green/charcoal interior 1985 V6 model in excellent shape but bare bones (no options). It showed 170,000km, and was priced kinda high. Next was a light blue '84 Cougar that I passed on because the car had to be started with a screwdriver on the solenoid. Moving on, was a dark blue 85 or 86 with the 5.0, but the "service" light was on and that spooked me (remember, no internet back then). Finally I looked at a silver/grey two tone Bird but didn't even get out of the car to look because the entire passenger side was rusted away. After all this I ended up going back to that light sage green 85. I called the guy and went to look at it again. I really loved the charcoal interior and the light sage green paint actually looked good. It was an original owner car that was clearly well kept. He came down in price and I bought it, and the rest, as they say, is history. Over the years I learned several things about that car (and the others that I looked at), including the fact that the odometer can only show a maximum of 199,999. Those 170k on the odometer were actually 270k. Also I learned that the "service" light was not actually a problem, that the starting problem on that Cougar could likely have been fixed easy and cheap, and that after two years my 85 rusted away as badly as that two tone grey Bird had. But I was hooked. The green Bird was only the first of several (others included an 87 5.0 Sport, 88 5.0 Cougar LS, 88 5.0 Base, 87 Turbo Coupe (parts car), and a '91 V6 that was the first car I borrowed money to buy and to this day remains the biggest POS I ever owned.

I also, later on, found out that the 85 was a very rare car, probably a one of one. Rare, but not desirable. It was one of very few light sage green Birds made, one of even fewer with the charcoal interior, and even fewer still with its lack of factory options. When I said it was base, I meant BASE. No power windows, seats, mirrors or locks (in fact it only had one door mirror, and the center console switch plate was totally blank). No A/C. No cruise control. No power trunk or fuel door. AM/FM radio with no cassette. Cheapo wheel covers. The only factory options it had were the metallic paint and a front plate bracket still in the packaging in the trunk. It also had a full size spare (original and never used!).

But it was beautiful, it rode really smooth compared to the Firebirds before it, and the V6 was even just about as quick as that 301 Pontiac. When I someday again own a four-eyed Bird it will be painted light sage green metallic, and it will have a charcoal interior. But it won't be a V6, it won't be base, and it certainly won't have base wheel covers...
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #9
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;461952
My first two cars were birds of an entirely different feather. #1 was a 1978 Trans Am powered by a '70 LT1, fantastic power but in very poor condition. #2 was a 1980 Formula Firebird, powered by a 301, mint body but really, really slow. There was also a 66 Galaxie 500 in between those two but it was never a daily driver (It was mint and powered by a 390, but too hard on gas for my high school finances). One day, when I was starting to get bored with the Formula, I saw a white 1984 T-Bird in a used car lot (this was circa 1991). I was smitten. I took it out for a drive and fell in love with it. The used car lot tried to stiff me on the trade in value of the Formula (they offered $800) so I drove away in my Firebird. I was now determined to own a Thunderbird. At the time I paid little attention to "newer" cars, so I didn't know much about them. The internet did not exist so research was not easy, but eventually I found out that 83-86 looked the same and that the Cougars were similar. Didn't know the nuances between the model years yet, but I knew enough to know I wanted one. I sold the Firebird privately for $2500 and immediately started looking. That white one was long gone, so I picked up the local "Bargain Hunter" and started calling. I was only sure of one thing: Unlike the two Firebirds and the Galaxie I was not going to buy the first car I looked at. First came a light sage green/charcoal interior 1985 V6 model in excellent shape but bare bones (no options). It showed 170,000km, and was priced kinda high. Next was a light blue '84 Cougar that I passed on because the car had to be started with a screwdriver on the solenoid. Moving on, was a dark blue 85 or 86 with the 5.0, but the "service" light was on and that spooked me (remember, no internet back then). Finally I looked at a silver/grey two tone Bird but didn't even get out of the car to look because the entire passenger side was rusted away. After all this I ended up going back to that light sage green 85. I called the guy and went to look at it again. I really loved the charcoal interior and the light sage green paint actually looked good. It was an original owner car that was clearly well kept. He came down in price and I bought it, and the rest, as they say, is history. Over the years I learned several things about that car (and the others that I looked at), including the fact that the odometer can only show a maximum of 199,999. Those 170k on the odometer were actually 270k. Also I learned that the "service" light was not actually a problem, that the starting problem on that Cougar could likely have been fixed easy and cheap, and that after two years my 85 rusted away as badly as that two tone grey Bird had. But I was hooked. The green Bird was only the first of several (others included an 87 5.0 Sport, 88 5.0 Cougar LS, 88 5.0 Base, 87 Turbo Coupe (parts car), and a '91 V6 that was the first car I borrowed money to buy and to this day remains the biggest POS I ever owned.

I also, later on, found out that the 85 was a very rare car, probably a one of one. Rare, but not desirable. It was one of very few light sage green Birds made, one of even fewer with the charcoal interior, and even fewer still with its lack of factory options. When I said it was base, I meant BASE. No power windows, seats, mirrors or locks (in fact it only had one door mirror, and the center console switch plate was totally blank). No A/C. No cruise control. No power trunk or fuel door. AM/FM radio with no cassette. Cheapo wheel covers. The only factory options it had were the metallic paint and a front plate bracket still in the packaging in the trunk. It also had a full size spare (original and never used!).

But it was beautiful, it rode really smooth compared to the Firebirds before it, and the V6 was even just about as quick as that 301 Pontiac. When I someday again own a four-eyed Bird it will be painted light sage green metallic, and it will have a charcoal interior. But it won't be a V6, it won't be base, and it certainly won't have base wheel covers...

Why was the 91 a POS? After all, it was a next gen car with the longer wheelbase, better ride, better suspension, better looking (according to FOMOCO), etc. etc.

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #10
Fox chassis. Even with all of its engineering shortcomings, it is one of the easiest chassis ANYWHERE to upgrade/update. FoMoCo tried something different with the styling, to bring the 'Box' into the aerodynamic age. Styling might be questionable, but to me it is what I remember growing up.

I own an FN10, and while I love its' looks and ride, there is just something so basic and primal about the FOX that it appeals to a whole different side of me.

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #11
Three reasons, Ricky Smith, Bob Glidden and Bill Elliot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14XCgzCcfsk
1986 Thunderbird Elan 5.0 EFI AOD, 3.73:1 SN95 rear, 17" Mustang Bullitts w/Firestone WO Indy 500's. Future plan: 349 stroker, C9 block, forged dish pistons, Scat 9000 crank, 4340 I beam rods, ARP head/main studs, ported explorer intake, 1.72 CC RR, Vortech V2 supercharger, Mr. Freeze Meth Inj, intercooler, TFS 190 11R CNC heads (66CC), BBK shorties with 2.5" duals, 4R70W Transmission, Taurus fan.

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #12
The mn-12 cars had a ton of issues. They rusted thru when they were just a few years old, had a super complicated and relatively fragile suspension for a 4000lb car (a base model v-6 with low options weighed over 3800lbs) and had a ton of odd small problems and recalls.

My friends mom was a real estate agent. One house she sold belonged to an old couple that owned a 94 xr7 (4.6 v-8) with 35k on it, and this was in about 2005. They bought it and gave it to my buddys little sister. abs light was on (still original brakes), the transmission had been replaced(why? Really low milegae) the speedometer didnt work, but the odometer did, and even though it was garage kept (paint and interior were flawless) it had holes every where.

When we took it in for emissions, they put the car up on the lift, and the jacking points went through the car. They showed us where the outside paint looked perfect, but all the metal underneath had rusted away. It was a fun car to drive, especially with the independent rear. Went to a junkyard at around 65k miles a few years after.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #13
Quote from: rotorr22;461955
Three reasons, Ricky Smith, Bob Glidden and Bill Elliot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14XCgzCcfsk
Nuff said...

Around 10 years ago I owned a '95 with Eibach springs & 17" wheels, handled like it was on rails and rode decent, but it wasn't my '88... At 72K front suspension was already on way out, sold it in less than a year... Also it had the wimpy ass 4.6 that I despise as a performance engine(not a engine, it's a appliance, only engine I loathe more is the Ford 3.8), if it'd had a 5.0 I may have kept it...

Why do you guys love 83-88 T-Birds & Cougars so much?

Reply #14
Quote from: Haystack;461957
The mn-12 cars had a ton of issues. They rusted thru when they were just a few years old, had a super complicated and relatively fragile suspension for a 4000lb car (a base model v-6 with low options weighed over 3800lbs) and had a ton of odd small problems and recalls.

My friends mom was a real estate agent. One house she sold belonged to an old couple that owned a 94 xr7 (4.6 v-8) with 35k on it, and this was in about 2005. They bought it and gave it to my buddys little sister. abs light was on (still original brakes), the transmission had been replaced(why? Really low milegae) the speedometer didnt work, but the odometer did, and even though it was garage kept (paint and interior were flawless) it had holes every where.

When we took it in for emissions, they put the car up on the lift, and the jacking points went through the car. They showed us where the outside paint looked perfect, but all the metal underneath had rusted away. It was a fun car to drive, especially with the independent rear. Went to a junkyard at around 65k miles a few years after.

Thanks for the feedback. I didn't realize the 89-97 Cougars were that heavy! My 86 Cougar's factory color is Midnight Wine. It looks pretty bad at this point but no rust holes since it's a Texas car. Do you know if Ford ever did a recall on the factory paint jobs on the Foxbody cars?