Skip to main content
Topic: Which cam? (Read 5169 times) previous topic - next topic

Which cam?

Having trouble deciding on which cam I want to go with.

The engine is mostly stock internally, P heads with a valve job, 1.6 roller rockers, and possibly some porting done (not sure yet, so that's uncertain for now) and BBK 1515 headers, Flowmaster 2.5" exhaust all the way to the bumper.
Inlet duty is by a Cobra or possibly an Explorer intake, and I've got an Explorer TB to use. Don't really have a specific power goal, just wanting something that runs well with these parts, and is reliable with an A9L and a T5. 3.55 gear out back, also.

What would you guys recommend, lift wise, and duration?
I like the numbers of the X303, but I'm not sure if I'll have PtV issues with it. Comp cams has one that's .512 lift, but has an RPM range from 1,800 to 5,800...but I've never heard anything about comp cams.

Then of course there's a proven runner, TFS Stage 1. I'm really liking this, and there's been so many guys run 'em and make great power that it's even stupid to waste time asking about it and I should probably just STFU and order the ed thing right now..

I'd like a little bit of a rumbly idle, but I put function of form, per se.

What's the general consensus on this? Thanks in advance. :D:bowdown:
'98 Explorer 5.0
'20 Malibu (I know, Chevy, but, 35MPG. Let's go brandon, eh)

Which cam?

Reply #1
I think about this kind of stuff all the time and my biggest concern is streetability and gas mileage.
I kinda like the idea of adding oem parts from other years/cars yet still keeping the decent gas economy.

not sure where your mind is on this part but fuel consumption coupled with power is important.
there are so many people who have pm'd me about this topic and some have said they simply cant afford to drive the car anymore like they use to.

Which cam?

Reply #2
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;426105
Then of course there's a proven runner, TFS Stage 1. I'm really liking this, and there's been so many guys run 'em and make great power that it's even stupid to waste time asking about it and I should probably just STFU and order the ed thing right now..

I'd like a little bit of a rumbly idle, but I put function of form, per se.

What's the general consensus on this? Thanks in advance. :D:bowdown:

The Stage 1 has just enough lope to be noticeable and pulls hard to fuel cutoff at 6250... Needs a 3K or so converter to really turn on in a automatic but with the deep gears of a 5-speed you'd be ready to go...

Running between 60 & 65 I've gotten as high as 26.3 MPG in my bird with 3.73 gear(few of the real TC at Carlisle bested that number)... Also it's run 13.11 @ 105 in it younger days before I beat on it like a redheaded step child... That was with a 2600 converter, with another 500-600 RPM stall it would have gone at least a 12.90...

Which cam?

Reply #3
I appreciate the mileage concerns, but I drive a 5.0/AWD Mountaineer...mileage matters not. Especially on something that would be driven maybe 2 or 3 times a week. However, as long as it gets better than 10 in town I don't put a lot of worry into that. :)

I was breifly kicking around the notion of taking the fresh rebuilt AOD that was in the parts Stang and slapping a 3200 stall converter in it and going with it, but I think I'll have the T5 overhauled or even do it myself and stay with a manual. I think with the combo I mentioned the T5 ought to survive. There won't be any sticky tired launches in it's future, but the car does have some Nitto 555's on it...I guess they're pretty grippy for what they are..

Looks like the TFS 1 is it...I've never heard very much bad about them. I might even tear the block down and have it cleaned, new main and rod bearings, pretty much a freshening up. It's be awesome to bore it for a little more grunt but that's moneys I ain'ts gots.
'98 Explorer 5.0
'20 Malibu (I know, Chevy, but, 35MPG. Let's go brandon, eh)

Which cam?

Reply #4
There isn't much bad to say about it besides, I dunno, maybe TF or someone else has come up with something MORE potent with a SMOOTHER idle. The wonders of high-resolution CNC machining. But my black cougar has it (the whole TF Track Heat top end kit) and it doesn't really turn on until past 3 grand, but as stated, with bigger gears to dig you out of the hole, it works great. It's not going to idle at 600 rpm and let you just ease out of the clutch and start moving like a '51 Pontiac with a  straight-8...but an E303 stalls violently if you step off the straight and narrow of keeping well over 1000-1500 rpm as you leave the stoplight. The TF Stage 1 is a very safe choice that won't piss you off in a "coulda had more" way.

They do innovate quite a bit, the whole "twisted wedge" rotated valve orientation apparently is patented, their own idea, and apparently does a lot for airflow.
1987 20th Anniversary Cougar, 302 "5.0" GT-40 heads (F3ZE '93 Cobra) and TMoss Ported H.O. intake, H.O. camshaft
2.5" Duals, no cats, Flowmaster 40s, Richmond 3.73s w/ Trac-Lok, maxed out Baumann shift kit, 3000 RPM Dirty Dog non-lock TC
Aside from the Mustang crinkle headers, still looks like it's only 150 HP...
1988 Black XR7 Trick Flow top end, Tremec 3550
1988 Black XR7 Procharger P600B intercooled, Edelbrock Performer non-RPM heads, GT40 intake AOD, 13 PSI @5000 RPM. 93 octane

Which cam?

Reply #5
Yeah, I don't want something that's a pain in the s at stoplights, what driving I will do is going to be 95% street. Manners are a must have, some lope is ok but not required, but the preference is definitely some strong low to mid range power and torque.

On the other hand, I wonder how something like this would also work in a Mountaineer such as mine? May have to do some searching and see if some folks at the ranger station and the explorer forums have tried it, and to what success they've gotten to...hmmm.
 it, I hate when I start to thinking too far along...I get into trouble..LOL.
'98 Explorer 5.0
'20 Malibu (I know, Chevy, but, 35MPG. Let's go brandon, eh)

Which cam?

Reply #6
The cam question maybe better on a mustang board...
I would search for the 94-95 5.0 5speed recommended setups....as they are a similar weight to our cars...

Hope this helps.

Travis

Which cam?

Reply #7
I just said to hell with it and plunked down $300 and had an Ed Curtis custom cam ground for the 331 in the Coupe.  I was tired of asking which off the shelf cam will work best with my combo when in all reality none of them were on the money.  I did run a Comp stick in the Coupe back when it had a 306 with ported 351W D0ZZ heads and a Tom Moss ported lower Cobra intake and that little motor would pull like a mule all the way to the chip through the first four gears and put it on the rev limiter in 5th.  I'd have to dig a bit but I think I still have the cam card on that motor somewhere.

Don't worry about a T-5 handling the power as long as you do not run full out slicks or drag radials with a car that manages 1.60's or better all day long.  My T-5 is behind a 331 in my Coupe now and taking the punishment just fine.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Which cam?

Reply #8
Quote from: Aerocoupe;426156
I just said to hell with it and plunked down $300 and had an Ed Curtis custom cam ground for the 331 in the Coupe.  I was tired of asking which off the shelf cam will work best with my combo when in all reality none of them were on the money.


THIS.

I did the same thing.  Best money I've ever spent on the cat.
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Which cam?

Reply #9
Quote from: Aerocoupe;426156
with ported 351W D0ZZ heads

Darren

a few stang guys keep telling me to find a set of those heads,,,,im tempted

Which cam?

Reply #10
Quote from: Aerocoupe;426156
I just said to hell with it and plunked down $300 and had an Ed Curtis custom cam ground for the 331 in the Coupe.  I was tired of asking which off the shelf cam will work best with my combo when in all reality none of them were on the money.  I did run a Comp stick in the Coupe back when it had a 306 with ported 351W D0ZZ heads and a Tom Moss ported lower Cobra intake and that little motor would pull like a mule all the way to the chip through the first four gears and put it on the rev limiter in 5th.  I'd have to dig a bit but I think I still have the cam card on that motor somewhere.

Don't worry about a T-5 handling the power as long as you do not run full out slicks or drag radials with a car that manages 1.60's or better all day long.  My T-5 is behind a 331 in my Coupe now and taking the punishment just fine.

Darren


If you're using the TW heads, I'll never believe any custom cam with equal idle/vac characteristics will make enough extra power to be worth the difference in price over one of the TF cams...

 

Which cam?

Reply #11
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;427115
If you're using the TW heads, I'll never believe any custom cam with equal idle/vac characteristics will make enough extra power to be worth the difference in price over one of the TF cams...


Never is a long time.  If you've never tried a custom cam. You'll never know the difference.
After the experience I had with my first custom cam, I wouldn't go any other way.  I've had three, with significantly different combos.  Each exceeded my expectations. Worth my money.

Which cam?

Reply #12
Eh, to each is there own.  Most engine builders with any common sense will tell a guy that the cam makes or breaks the engine as it is the brain of the operations.  I took the custom cam recommendation route after the second time the machinists and the engine builder told me it was the only way to go with a high performance motor.  When you put together a $5K or higher dollar motor the cost difference between a $275 - $300 off the shelf cam and a $350 custom ground cam to the overall project is a non-issue but the potential gains are definitely worth investigating.  A person also has to understand that if the information given to the cam builder is critical to getting the cam that makes the combination work so filling out the long information form is crucial to getting the best cam for the combo that is being built.

When I sent the information to Ed Curtis the first time he emailed me back and said that the Comp Cam I was running was really good for the combo but I could expect a little more peak hp with his cam but the power curve would get broader.  This means more area under the curve which is more power on tap through more of the RPM range than what I currently had.  I opted to leave my combo alone at that time as I knew I was going to build a 331 that summer and would be selling the short block.  The 331 has an Ed Curtis cam and it was well worth the extra $50 on that motor.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Which cam?

Reply #13
Quote from: Aerocoupe;427213
Eh, to each is there own. 

Darren

Yep for sure...

What not being noticed  is I said TRICK FLOW heads with their  cam... Those cams are matched to the heads and AFAIK NO ONE is offering the same grinds(yeah I know different suppliers offer the exact cams as a one fits all)... Maybe I'm all wet here but sure seems to me if TW can design a head, they surely can supply a good cam to be used with it... 

Yeah I'm probably gonna hear a custom cam will produce 10 more Hp than a Stage 1 and then I pull out a TW Stage 2 and best your cam by 10 Hp, where does it end??? I have slightly over $1000 in cam and heads combined(cam was $139), and I'm happy...

Which cam?

Reply #14
You make a good point in that if you choose the correct cam then there should be no point in changing it unless the combination changes or the operating parameters. It all comes down to the combination and operating parameters which will vary from one person to the next.

The TW cams cannot cover this nor can the off the shelf Comps. If what you have is working and your happy with it then you choose well. I'm that guy that wants every bit of power out of the bones I put into a motor so I go custom.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp