slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Topic: slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth (Read 3031 times) previous topic - next topic

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #15 – August 07, 2009, 11:00:26 PM

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #16 – August 07, 2009, 11:01:00 PM

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #17 – August 07, 2009, 11:01:30 PM

If you look in the picture of engine bay you can see three cats all together! LOVE IT!

EDIT: The first picture of engine bay.

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #18 – August 07, 2009, 11:06:30 PM

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #19 – August 07, 2009, 11:06:51 PM

[/IMG]

my black xr7

Reply #20 – August 07, 2009, 11:08:04 PM

[/IMG]

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #21 – August 07, 2009, 11:09:41 PM

my 1988 xr7

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #22 – August 07, 2009, 11:10:28 PM

wanna see more pics got my facebook page. search for jamie dancy, grand forks nd

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #23 – August 07, 2009, 11:11:43 PM

Looking great so far.I plan on getting the inner fenders done on mine as well when I get the temporary car here.I'm going to hide a bunch of wires as well.You've done some nice work.That last shot reminds me of how high the front of my Sport sat before I dropped it a little.

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #24 – August 08, 2009, 12:04:27 AM

I would ditch those afr's unless your dead set on them. Trick flows would really help that thing out.

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #25 – August 08, 2009, 12:28:21 AM

Quote from: Haystack;285776

I would ditch those afr's unless your dead set on them. Trick flows would really help that thing out.

For what reason exactly? I'd prefer the AFR's (165 or 185 depending on displacement) due to much increased efficiency and a wide torque curve.

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #26 – August 08, 2009, 12:38:24 AM

Quote

For what reason exactly? I'd prefer the AFR's (165 or 185 depending on displacement) due to much increased efficiency and a wide torque curve.

Either heads are great but i agree......

Looks really nice BTW,.....

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #27 – August 08, 2009, 11:24:00 AM

thanks, i got the 185 and man i goes. its got plenty of power for me and a sound that is out of this world, it should for the amount of money i got into it lol

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #28 – August 08, 2009, 11:48:56 AM

I didn't realize it mentioned 347 in a title in one of your posts - perfect head for that combo. Do you mention cam somewhere on this site? A 347 with decent parts is about as good a combination one can have in a stock block since it already approaches the limits of the casting. No forced induction needed there! I'm sure the intake is a little limiting though.

I think the trick flow can have higher peak numbers though due to the insanely large valves for most setups.

slowly getting the engine bay looking smooth

Reply #29 – August 08, 2009, 12:02:44 PM

the cam is e303 ford racing, good cam, i chose the gt40 intake for its looks and its way better than the stock intake. roller rockers, this motor =has serious horse power. all naturally aspritated just like my ass