Skip to main content
Topic: I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me... (Read 6110 times) previous topic - next topic

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

I jacked the 'Bird up and took all the wheels off, preparing for the paint job. While sanding the front bumper cover I happened to glance at the right coil spring - it looked funny, like it was in crooked. A closer look revealed that the spring is broken - not at the bottom like every other Fox I've seen with broken springs, but at the top. This was the TC spring I swapped in last winter. I chucked my stock V8 springs because they were both broken on bottom, so it looks as though I'm up for a set of springs...

I'll take pics later. Right now I want some distance between me and that car...
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #1
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;182433
Right now I want some distance between me and that car...


I know that feeling well. I'm getting tired of breaking something every time I drive the '86.
For example, this is what has developed in the past month:
  • Dead fuel injector
  • Another exhaust leak
  • Broken odometer [SIZE="1"](tapped hard on cluster to make it work again)[/SIZE]
  • Broken motor mount
  • XR-7 center fell off of one of the c-pillar emblems
  • Broken IAC plug
  • Boost leak [SIZE="1"](even after installing proper compressor housing for intercooler)[/SIZE]
What's tough is that I want to paint it in the spring, but with all of these mechanical problems, I don't know if I'll have the patience for it by then. I mean, is it really worth it to paint the car when its hood spends more time up than it does down?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #2
Yeah, I just went with the almost identical Mach 1 springs on the front of mine after finding a broken one when upgrading control arms/brakes. I love 'em. Just beware that you will lower the front quite a bit (well, depending where you are now). My front fenders are sitting 26.2" on average above the pavement @ center. This is with the rears sitting @ 28.2" average above above the pavement, so I may be lower in the front due to the rake. This is with stock wheels & 225-60-15 tires. I am not sure what the stock height of the front should be - can someone post this?

I am going to put the Mach 1 springs on the back too. The back sits WAY too high due to the CHE adjustables and I am at the lowest adjustment point. When I put in the shorter Mach 1 springs, I will be able to adjust upward and get the height I want. I am not sure what the load rating of the Mach 1 springs is, but the 250 lb/in rate is higher than most other Mustang rears and higher than the 200 lb/in rate of the stock springs (I think that's the rate). Anyway, it's a chance I'm willing to take to get me some adjustability out of this setup.
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

 

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #3
Carm,
I have a set of TC springs (2 actually) if you need em quick.

The stock 99-04 GT springs are 450# front/210# rear
01 Bullit springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 3/4" lower
03-04 Mach 1 springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 1/2" lower

The 99-04 GT springs sit lower then 87-88 TC/Sport/XR7 Springs, so keep that in mind.

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #4
Quote from: Aerobird Motorsports;182455
Carm,
I have a set of TC springs (2 actually) if you need em quick.

The stock 99-04 GT springs are 450# front/210# rear
01 Bullit springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 3/4" lower
03-04 Mach 1 springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 1/2" lower

The 99-04 GT springs sit lower then 87-88 TC/Sport/XR7 Springs, so keep that in mind.

What are the TC spring rates?
One 88

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #5
how much lower will the '99-'04 GT springs lower our cars?

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #6
Quote from: Cougar5.0;182450
Yeah, I just went with the almost identical Mach 1 springs on the front of mine after finding a broken one when upgrading control arms/brakes. I love 'em. Just beware that you will lower the front quite a bit (well, depending where you are now). My front fenders are sitting 26.2" on average above the pavement @ center. This is with the rears sitting @ 28.2" average above above the pavement, so I may be lower in the front due to the rake. This is with stock wheels & 225-60-15 tires. I am not sure what the stock height of the front should be - can someone post this?

I am going to put the Mach 1 springs on the back too. The back sits WAY too high due to the CHE adjustables and I am at the lowest adjustment point. When I put in the shorter Mach 1 springs, I will be able to adjust upward and get the height I want. I am not sure what the load rating of the Mach 1 springs is, but the 250 lb/in rate is higher than most other Mustang rears and higher than the 200 lb/in rate of the stock springs (I think that's the rate). Anyway, it's a chance I'm willing to take to get me some adjustability out of this setup.

We are actually in the EXACT same boat then - when I installed the TC springs the front of the car came WAY down (as in about 2-3" between the front air dam and the pavement), and the CHE adjustables brought the butt WAY up. It looks like a 70's ghetto cruiser. I was gonna ditch the rear TC springs in favour of the Bullitt ones anyway, so now I'll just have to do all four.

Quote from: cougarcragar;182445
I know that feeling well. I'm getting tired of breaking something every time I drive the '86.
For example, this is what has developed in the past month:
  • Dead fuel injector
  • Another exhaust leak
  • Broken odometer (tapped hard on cluster to make it work again)
  • Broken motor mount
  • XR-7 center fell off of one of the c-pillar emblems
  • Broken IAC plug
  • Boost leak (even after installing proper compressor housing for intercooler)
What's tough is that I want to paint it in the spring, but with all of these mechanical problems, I don't know if I'll have the patience for it by then. I mean, is it really worth it to paint the car when its hood spends more time up than it does down?
At least you get to drive yours every now and then - it's coming up on a full year since mine's been road legal (safety sticker ran out in Oct 2006), and I put it in the garage very shortly after that sticker ran out.
Quote from: Aerobird Motorsports;182455
Carm,
I have a set of TC springs (2 actually) if you need em quick.

The stock 99-04 GT springs are 450# front/210# rear
01 Bullit springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 3/4" lower
03-04 Mach 1 springs are 600# front/250# rear and are 1/2" lower

The 99-04 GT springs sit lower then 87-88 TC/Sport/XR7 Springs, so keep that in mind.

I hadn't even considered Mach 1 springs. Hmmm...

Thanks for the offer on the TC springs, but I'm going with brand new this time. Used springs are what got me into this mess to begin with :mad: I'm in no hurry anyway - winter's just around the corner, so the car is gonna stay in the garage for another six months or so anyway...

The carnage:
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #7
I nabbed a set of used Mach 1 springs for $100 shipped. You'd never know they were used though - good deal for me I think. The Mach 1 front springs are 1/8th of a turn longer than the Bullitt, so they claim they lower the car slightly less (1/4") than the Bullits. Since the Mach's are not the "hot" item that the Bullitt setup is, they may be easier to come by.
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #8
I have thought of lowering the front of the Sport by an inch (or so).If I add new springs and end up an inch lower,will that require a new front end alignment?
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #9
Quote from: vinnietbird;182490
I have thought of lowering the front of the Sport by an inch (or so).If I add new springs and end up an inch lower,will that require a new front end alignment?


Oh, yeah! When the tie rod angle is offset like that it causes the tires to pull in. I realigned mine in the garage :hick: Actually, I think I got it pretty close. The other issue angled tie-rods causes is bump-steer, though ~1" isn't too bad as far as I can tell so far with the Mach 1 springs. You can get a bump steer kit if needed.
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #10
Yay, more Bullitt/Mach 1 spring users... never thought I'd see the day. Yoos guys make me so proud. lol. :D

Spread the word, and convert the masses!!!
2005 Subaru WRX STi|daily driver

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #11
Well Carm, hopefully I can get my car done in a couple of weeks.  I'm going to be putting some 25k 02' GT springs in my V6 cougar.  I'll post some up with the before & after pics.

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #12
TC Springs are 400#/200# IIRC. "Base" springs sat ~1" higher then TC springs and were 275#/125#.

That's what my notes say, but it's all second-hand info, all the SN95 spring stuff I have I got straight from the Ford Motorsports order books.

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #13
So am I way off or do SN95 springs fit Foxes with no modification?

I hate this car. Looks like it's gonna be Bullitt springs for me...

Reply #14
SN95 Springs must be cut before installed on Foxes, correct?