Skip to main content
Topic: compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers (Read 3308 times) previous topic - next topic

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #15
I'm not going to bother camming it until I go the full turbo route. And that's a loooooong way out. What's next for the engine will be to of course finish the exhaust and then a set of roller rockers. At some point in the relatively near future I'm going to attempt a MAF conversion also. I want to get it out of the way since I have to do it for the turbos later and hopefully I can squeeze a few extra horses out of it while still N/A also. Perhaps after that some shiny new valve covers and/or intake and then its going to sit there and look pretty for a few months (years) while I work on getting the rest of the car up to date.

Then I've got the twin turbo setup to figure out. I'm considering c00ching up a TC turbo and setting it for very low boost, (5-8 psi), and running it through there. It is a very cheap way (~$500) for me to have some boosted fun until I can afford to build the engine and get the turbos and everything situated later on for the real project. Of course, I'll probably just let it go N/A until I pull the trigger on the final setup. Idk, it depends on how well I like it after I get it on the road again, and how much money I can afford to throw at it in the next year or so.
--Steve
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L
2011 Mustang 3.7L

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #16
Quote from: sarjxxx;356897
it depends on how well I like it after I get it on the road again

 
I can't believe you're saying that....:beatyoass: lol You know you're gonna love it when you get it back on the road:evilgrin:
FOXLESS!!

1994 Lincoln Mark VIII


compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #17
Whew, I love my car! Er, my car loves twisty roads! The tires stick great and she's got a great blance in the corners! I really need to get the EFI back on there though, as she only returned about 15MPG for the last week of VERY spirited driving! Of course. If I installed the Wideband, that would probably help by telling me when to keep my foot out of it.

You realize you'll have to build a forged block for twin turbos, right? The max boost you can safely put through the stocker is about 9Psi, and at that you have to make sure the motor is completely at temperature before getting on it.

P.S. I too, thought you would be getting LT's. But I'm glad you found SOMETHING that actually fit.
1983 Tbird with '03 Split Port V6 motor swap done! Headers, dual exhaust, 500CFM Edelbrock, 3G upgrade, Electric fan. 3.73 Gears and an FRPP Limited Slip. Five lug complete! 5-Speed conversion complete! Standalone Fuel Injection in progress...

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #18
Ok that's not what I meant LOL! Of course I'm going to love it whenI get back on the road, I just meant how I feel a bout the acceleration, which on the 3.8 is going to be....well ya know..... But we'll see cause it was pretty decent before, so maybe it'll feel good.

Yes, I know I will need a forged block! I wouldn't even put more that 8 psi through the stock motor.

My plan, and this is why this is so far out, is to pick up a stock SC short block (completely rebuilt of course), and install a Split-port top end on it, complete with roller rockers and ported heads and windstar intakes.  It will also be receiving a Morana forged 4.2 crank, and a custom cam to help bring out the turbo power. So just building the motor alone, depending on whether or not I do it myself or have my SC building buddy do it, could cost me anywhere from $500-$1500 easy so that's part of why this is for much much later on. Then on top of that I have to buy turbos and have the pipes fabbed since I have neither a welder nor a bending machine.
--Steve
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L
2011 Mustang 3.7L

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #19
I have heard that stock 5.0 shorties can be modified to just use the tc turbo's bolted right to them. Looks like yours should be close enough to do the same.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #20
interesting... this could be true, although I think these may be better suited for the project:

--Steve
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L
2011 Mustang 3.7L

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #21
Anyone know if there would be the same problem on an '84 Engine/Bay? (I assume so, But doesn't hurt to ask)
~Project ThunderStorm = '84 Charcoal Thunderbird - First Car - Long Time Work in Progress~
~Project (No Name Yet) = 1970 Plymouth GTX/RR "Clone"~

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #22
I am 99% sure it would be the same. That is the reason I am trying to give them to you for basically free. The only difference may be that your mounts may be different so it could be slightly different from what I had.
--Steve
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L
2011 Mustang 3.7L

 

compatibility issue with shortie v6 headers

Reply #23
Do you think you still need to ditch the colum shifter with the 94-98 headers?