Skip to main content
Topic: Subaru turbo (Read 1859 times) previous topic - next topic

Subaru turbo

Reply #1
almost positive that subies use IHI turbos but I dunno about the
2013 Focus (Daily)
1968 Cougar XR7
1987 Turbo Coupe
5 Speed, Stock IHI, Aeromotive 340LPH, Stinger 3in DP w/Magnaflow 3in Race Series ler, Hallman Boost Controller, Corbeau Fixed Back Racing Seats, Rebuilt 35# Injectors, Kirban AFPR, Stinger's Front Mount Piping w/Big NPR Front Mount IC, 3/8 E-85 Fuel Lines, SPEC Stage 3+ Clutch, Explorer 4.0 Dual Core Radiator, Optima Red Top Battery
1988 Turbo Coupe (RIP)
1984 Cougar (RIP) :cougarsmily:
1986 Cougar XR7 5 Speed.  (sold)

Subaru turbo

Reply #2
Any idea if they are bigger or smaller than the rhb52?
1988 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
'89 5.0 w/ ported intakes, Mallory Adjustable FPR, BBK shorties and H with 2.5" Flows, 130 amp 3G, 89 Mustang comp/wiring, Aluminum radiator w/ elec fan, T5 trans, King Cobra clutch, 3.55 gears, 13" Cobra brakes (front), Wilwood prop valve, Mustang A-arms, Front Coil-overs, MM CC plates, Silver 17x9 R's, 03 Cobra IRS, Aluminum DS, 2002 Mustang dash/console etc..., custom leather seats

Subaru turbo

Reply #3
That sure LOOKS like a tiny compressor housing.
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon

Subaru turbo

Reply #4
look at the car it's from..300HP stock.  It's gotta be a decent one. I may take my spare exhaust and match it up.

Subaru turbo

Reply #5
That doesn't mean squat.

Waste your money if you like I guess...
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon

Subaru turbo

Reply #6
Thats an odd way to look at it. By the reasoning if a lugnut comes from a 550Hp Ford GT it MUST be good, right?

Subaru turbo

Reply #7
Quote from: lakenheath24;266933
look at the car it's from..300HP stock.  It's gotta be a decent one.


I have a feeling that the total engine design has a lot to do with the output on the Subaru motor. 

Quote
Turbocharged
2.5L boxer DOHC, 4 cylinder, 16 valves
Dual active valve control system
Sequential multi-port fuel injection
Alum alloy intake manifold
Cast-iron exhaust manifolds
Reinforced cast aluminum block, cast iron cylinder liners,  semi-closed deck design, five main bearings.
Bore: 99.5x79mm, 3.92x3.11
Hood scoop air intake intercooler
6700 RPM redline
Horsepower:  305hp@6000rpm,
Torque:  ft lbs 290@4000rpm


Read this thread:  http://www.iwsti.com/forums/2-5-liter-litre-factory-motor/77186-ihi-turbo-worthwile-upgrade.html
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Subaru turbo

Reply #8
Exactly! larger engine, DOHC, and the overall newer technology makes the 300hp not the turbo alone.

If you put that turbo on a 2.3 you might gain a little, but nowhere near if you put a t3, t3/t4 or HX35 on there. I would recommend you save up a bit and get a larger turbo.
2013 Focus (Daily)
1968 Cougar XR7
1987 Turbo Coupe
5 Speed, Stock IHI, Aeromotive 340LPH, Stinger 3in DP w/Magnaflow 3in Race Series ler, Hallman Boost Controller, Corbeau Fixed Back Racing Seats, Rebuilt 35# Injectors, Kirban AFPR, Stinger's Front Mount Piping w/Big NPR Front Mount IC, 3/8 E-85 Fuel Lines, SPEC Stage 3+ Clutch, Explorer 4.0 Dual Core Radiator, Optima Red Top Battery
1988 Turbo Coupe (RIP)
1984 Cougar (RIP) :cougarsmily:
1986 Cougar XR7 5 Speed.  (sold)

Subaru turbo

Reply #9
The 2.3 motor is pretty good on it's own as well....the turbo makes it even better...that's the way I was looking at it.  Hence why I was wondering what the specs on it were, before i "wasted" my money as someone so eloquently put it.

Subaru turbo

Reply #10
Hate to say it like this but maybe if you want to know about the SUBARU turbo you should ask SUBARU enthusiasts? Just a wayward thought.

Subaru turbo

Reply #11
Quote from: lakenheath24;267188
The 2.3 motor is pretty good on it's own as well....the turbo makes it even better...that's the way I was looking at it.  Hence why I was wondering what the specs on it were, before i "wasted" my money as someone so eloquently put it.


The 2.3 puts out around 100-110hp NA in stock form on a good day.  The addition of the turbo effectively doubled that in it's max factory trim.  The stock 2.3 head flows for , even ported they don't flow near what most modern heads do.  The 2.3T's had a pretty big turbo on them for the time and displacement because they were trying to cram a lot of air into them to get them to make power to overcome the poor-flowing design of the motor.  Had it flowed better, it would have required less turbo.  The T3's on the Ford 2.3T's are an "upgrade" to many of the other turbo cars of the time, such as the Volvos and Saabs. Hell, the turbo on my Volvo turbo is tiny compared to the stock .60/.63 T3's on the Fords.  Even at that, it put out the same power as the Fords even with a smaller displacement, smaller turbo and less boost...  Why?  A better flowing head.  I'm not talking about the 16V one folks are using as a conversion these days though. Even the 8V Volvo head is an "upgrade" over the Ford one in regards to flow.

That turbo is a small turbo to boost an already well-flowing.  They don't need to hang a big turbo on it to get the power.

Just because the Subie engine makes 300hp with that turbo, doesn't mean the 2.3T will.

It's a small turbo and a waste of your money (yes, I said it again). 

A T3/T4 or a Holset is your choice for the 2.3T, not a turbo smaller than what you have already.
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon

 

Subaru turbo

Reply #12
Gotcha Chuck, that's why my original post asked what the specs were, not to compare apple motors to orange motors. You never know when something of the wall, like a subaru turbo, might be a perfect fit.