Skip to main content
Topic: K&N filter......worth it? (Read 2336 times) previous topic - next topic

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #15
The filters themselves are WAY better than stock.more air,less  into the engine.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #16
See if theres anything from Jackson Racing for the mustang.  They make the supercharger kits for the miata.  this "Ram Air Intake by Jackson Racing" claims to add "up to 14hp in most cases."  i dunnoooo about that. the K&N Typhoon CAI is claiming 3.7hp at 6500RPM.  3.7hp at 1000rpm from redline doesnt seem worth it to me. o0oo! they add power!.. about as much as a SuperStreet sticker IMO.  look at headers and a cat-back system for noticable power :)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
:america: An American Restoration. :birdsmily:
1987 Ford Thunderbird Sport (resting)
1993 Mazda Miata 1.6l (daily driver)

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #17
Quote from: ~AC;264359
See if theres anything from Jackson Racing for the mustang. 


There isn't.

Intakes on the 5.0 I have heard can vary anywhere from 5-15ish hp. Not a whole lot of noticable gain there.

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #18
I've pulled all the *Ram Air* stuff out and I'm going to stick the stock air box and a paper filter on. When I get a chance to take it out (ya know when the weather stops being shiznitty and I can get it out) I expect to see no difference. We'll see though but I'm pretty sure I'm right ;)
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #19
So after reading this: http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm I'm going with a paper filter. It filters better than a K&N and costs less. Paper filters do flow less than a K&N, a whole 0.14% less for the worst flowing paper filter in the test. I'm pretty sure I won't miss that 0.14% flow ;)
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #20
Quote from: thunderjet302;265388
So after reading this: http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm I'm going with a paper filter. It filters better than a K&N and costs less. Paper filters do flow less than a K&N, a whole 0.14% less for the worst flowing paper filter in the test. I'm pretty sure I won't miss that 0.14% flow ;)


Agree 100%. It's also easier to just pickup paper filters when on sale and drop them in when dirty. There was some seller I saw last year (may have been eBay, may have been craigslist) that had like 30 Motorcraft filters (bulk stock) for like a buck a piece - had to buy them all though. I didn't get them at the time but should have.
1988 Thunderbird Sport

 

K&N filter......worth it?

Reply #21
So I finally took the car out for a spin after removing the March Ram Air kit with a K&N and putting the stock airbox and paper filter back on. Did I feel a difference? NO. Car felt the same. I now have an extra $37 in my pocket (K&N for stock airbox $45, Motorcraft paper filter $8) :banana:
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.