Skip to main content
Topic: Hoodlems (Read 5804 times) previous topic - next topic

Re: Hoodlems

Reply #30
You're right, you'd be on the hook if you set a y trap (I didn't care when I did it 17 years ago). This part of the law should change. You should have the right to defend your property against anyone that threatens it. It's a sad society in which a thief can slip on ice on your property and then sue you...
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

Re: Hoodlems

Reply #31
No we all know the consequences of doing that would be disastorous but we definetly wish we could.

 

Re: Hoodlems

Reply #32
dominator, atleast they didnt get pissed off about not being able to take the subs.. and ripping the cone out.

Trust me.. im suprised they didnt.