Skip to main content
Topic: Intake spacer and other upgrades (Read 6734 times) previous topic - next topic

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #60
Bah...

I'm just going to stick with my original plan.  Do the electric fan, Explorer intake, spacer, and UD pulleys for this engine to get it running 9s consistently and save everything else for when I build another engine from the ground up.  It's not worth it to dig all the way back into the current engine.  No oil leaks that I've noticed either.

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #61
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;169380
Same as before, you can run about any cam that's streetable with the E6s... I can't see it happening with E7s


ok, what sounds better on an SO bottom end? an E303 with E6 heads? or a HO cam with E7 heads? i guess the HO cam? i assume the E6's would hold too much power back.
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #62
On teh subject of cams.. and sorry for the jack, but PTV clearence was mentioned. What is teh MAX lift you can use in our cars without breaking stuff. In my case I have D5? heads. And I haven't picked a cam yet as I duno what to pick lift wise.

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #63
lift isnt the issue. its duration(how long the valve is open). most intake valves open when the piston is at BDC(bottom dead center).
1979 Ford Fairmont
[/B]
5.0L/4R70W/8.8"/5-lug/3" Exhuast


Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #64
I always thought it was lift that made it hit.
 
Revising my question, what is the limit for stock stuff?

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #65
Quote from: grutinator;169444
ok, what sounds better on an SO bottom end? an E303 with E6 heads? or a HO cam with E7 heads? i guess the HO cam? i assume the E6's would hold too much power back.

Interesting question...

Food for thought...

The '86 HO is basically a SO with a 58mm TB, non-HO intake, E6s and were rated at 200HP... So It's the cam, TB, and exhaust system that apparently makes the huge difference... Of course you need the other HO pieces(inj, EEC, etc), but they are the same on either...

Guessing with the true HO intake and the '87-up 60mm TB, HP would be approx 205 with the E6s...

All head/piston combos prior to '86 have the valve relifs.... It's ONLY the '86 HO(also '87 in the LSC) and the '86-'91 SO engines that do not have valve relifs...

If you go with the "E" you're going to need a Mass Air system...

 

Intake spacer and other upgrades

Reply #66
On the intake spacer question don't even waste your money on one. I have one and I don't notice a difference at all. I only have it for valve cover clearance.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.