Building bruiser Reply #30 – August 16, 2014, 07:04:18 AM No the air charge sensor does not effect the mixture to much and when it gets hot it pulls out timing and some fuel . I have been moving them for years like this. The intake gives it false readings. Moving it works great. Have a great day guys!! Quote Selected
Building bruiser Reply #31 – November 09, 2014, 10:00:35 AM ok moving the ACT is a first for me,, need to understand the pro's and consseems like it will reduce fuel economy for those like me who "like that".... I may be wrong. Quote Selected
Building bruiser Reply #32 – November 09, 2014, 11:05:00 PM You mean I drilled and tapped a hole in my explorer intake for nothing. . Looks like it will impede flow too. Quote Selected
Building bruiser Reply #33 – November 10, 2014, 09:59:56 AM The IAT/ACT sensor will start to pull timing around 190 degrees Fahrenheit at WOT. I've never really found too much info on what -- if anything -- it does under partial load (NOT WOT) conditions. The EEC-IV is used to seeing it at the position on the intake runner on a 5.0 car. The ACT spark advance/reduction on an EEC-V equipped vehicle is different altogether besides having it in the air intake before the TB. Me personally I'd not move it from the stock location on a 5.0 that is naturally aspirated. Some forced induction setups call for relocation.I know for my 4.6 3V it's built into the MAF sensor. When/if I ever decide to intercool the supercharger on that and crank up the boost it's pretty much a necessity to move it into the intake for safety purposes (i.e. not blowing stuff up). With the newer cars you have to retune every time you seem to do anything anyhow..... Quote Selected
Building bruiser Reply #34 – November 27, 2014, 01:22:10 PM Dam DEMON never likes my ideas. I am taking my tool box and locking it FOREVER. Quote Selected
Building bruiser Reply #35 – December 16, 2014, 08:44:34 PM I like that 2.3 timing hold device...great thinking....Travis Quote Selected