Skip to main content
Topic: 3" vs 2.5" Exhaust (Read 1507 times) previous topic - next topic

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

I'm thinking of buying Stinger-Performance full exhaust set-up from the manifold back (mine is finally unrepairable)on my '88 Turbocoupe 5sp. Just have a few (heh) questions.

1. Which is better 3" or 2.5" (oh, btw mines duals)
2. Has anyone every bought this from Stinger-Performance (are they good?)
3. I'm not a welder, but could I install this exhaust at the house?
Ride the Thunder & Feel the Power

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #1
I bought the Stinger 3" and, Frankly, I had issues with its fit and consequently ended up having a custom system made. Others have had few problems and seem quite happy. As they say, your mileage may vary!

I believe the place I had make my stainless system digitized it and so may be able to sell it as a kit. I could, however, be incorrect in this.

Shiny Side Up!
Bill
"as if 'religion' were something God invented, and not His statement to us of certain quite unalterable facts about His own nature." -C.S. Lewis

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #2
If you want the looks get the duals, if you want lighter weight and possibly better flow get the single 3". If you go single I recommend drivers side outlet. I think theres less  in the way on that side. I have the passenger side 3" and its tricky at times. The tailpipes I think is where people have the problems.
93 Festiva L, 193k miles, BP+T/G25MR swap, T3 50trim .48/.42, SRT FMIC, Capri electronics/Rocketchip, 2.5" exhaust
bests: ET 12.86, MPH 110.25, 1.92 short
02 Subaru Impreza WRX, 129k miles
97 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport, 236k miles

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #3
I've run a Stinger 3", and I didn't particularly like the fit. I had an exhaust guy tuck it up.
It's Gumby's fault.

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #4
I did the Stinger 3" to 2 1/2" duals with magnaflow lers. AWESOME!
1988 Thunderbird Sport. Work in Progress
5.8L swap w/fitech efi, 4R70W swap w/quick 4 controller, 2003 GT rear diff, 5 Lug swap

Bought this car back as an old project car.

:burnout:

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #5
duals are kinda stupid for a turbo car. Not useless, but if its already y-piped or single piped, I would stick with a single outlet IMO.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

3" vs 2.5" Exhaust

Reply #6
Just makes it or follows the original turbocoupe design.

The Stinger kit fit well with no problems. The problems were the Mustang cat back that I did with a Magnaflow system. I had to extend the tail pipes with 3" chrome tips and had to modifiy the metal box like thing close to the fuel tank with a BFH to get the pipe to fit on the pass side. But I did it all at work with no problems. But I see now that Stinger has tailpipes for the thunderbird now. I just don't see any hangers at all.
1988 Thunderbird Sport. Work in Progress
5.8L swap w/fitech efi, 4R70W swap w/quick 4 controller, 2003 GT rear diff, 5 Lug swap

Bought this car back as an old project car.

:burnout: