Skip to main content
Topic: Racin Chicken (Read 4816 times) previous topic - next topic

Racin Chicken

Reply #15
what years?

Racin Chicken

Reply #16
newer efi ones.. can't give you exact numbers right now...
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Racin Chicken

Reply #17
95 - 97.5 gt40
97.5 - 01 gt40p
gumby - beauty may fade, but stupid is forever!

Racin Chicken

Reply #18
will they work with standard ford intakes ? are they a direct bolt on or would i need to get them machined ?

Racin Chicken

Reply #19
Quote from: midget28;200687
will they work with standard ford intakes ? are they a direct bolt on or would i need to get them machined ?


I know of no SB Fords other than the Boss and Tunnel Port(extremely rare) 302s that require special intakes... Maybe some exotict after market stuff, but not the factory pieces...

Racin Chicken

Reply #20
i was just askin b/c i saw a gt40 take in a jegs catalog and wondered if that was the deal.

Racin Chicken

Reply #21
I'd be more than happy to help in anyway I can.

I've got a carbed V8.  The big question I have for you is what tranny are you gonna run??? 

I used E7 heads which were from a High Output motor.  130 bucks and they did a grind job on them.

If you're looking at the gt40's and P's then expect to spend 300 bucks just for the heads.  Plus the money for the grind job.

Also the Header options for the GT40's & P's are limited because of the spark plug angle.  If you have specific questions PM Cougar SE.  He'll help you out alot.
84 TC 302 -5.0L/t5/7.5 locking rear and a 3.45 gear, Edelbrock Intake, Aluminum Heads, Edlebrock 65mm Throttlebody, Edlebrock Cam, 24lb injectors & MAS Air Sensor calibrated via chip,  BBK headers, Catback H pipe, Magnaflow lers :evilgrin:
:pics-stfu:

 Project Thread with pics

Racin Chicken

Reply #22
ive got a c4 and aod trans which are both stock cofiguration b/c of the rules. Theres a 9 inch ford rearend which will either be getting 3:50 or 3:70 gears with minispool.ive got a set of e5 truck heads but ive heard some people say there descent and others say there better off as boat anchors.

Racin Chicken

Reply #23
Quote from: blu84302;201039
PM Cougar SE.


gumby - beauty may fade, but stupid is forever!

Racin Chicken

Reply #24
Quote from: blu84302;201039
I
Also the Header options for the GT40's & P's are limited because of the spark plug angle.  If you have specific questions PM Cougar SE.  He'll help you out alot.

P's YES, special header preferred, BUT I've heard of using the short bodied Accel plugs and running std headers...
 
Regular GT40s use the std plug location... AFIK any header fit's these...

Quote from: midget28;201049
ive got a c4 and aod trans which are both stock cofiguration b/c of the rules. Theres a 9 inch ford rearend which will either be getting 3:50 or 3:70 gears with minispool.ive got a set of e5 truck heads but ive heard some people say there descent and others say there better off as boat anchors.

E5 truck heads are basically the same as the E7TE used on the '87-up HO's... OK but GT40s kick their ass...

Racin Chicken

Reply #25
Claude (CougarSE) has a set of GT40's and GT40p's.  IMHO he's the person to ask questions about them.
84 TC 302 -5.0L/t5/7.5 locking rear and a 3.45 gear, Edelbrock Intake, Aluminum Heads, Edlebrock 65mm Throttlebody, Edlebrock Cam, 24lb injectors & MAS Air Sensor calibrated via chip,  BBK headers, Catback H pipe, Magnaflow lers :evilgrin:
:pics-stfu:

 Project Thread with pics

Racin Chicken

Reply #26
If the e5s are descent heads i might throw the 351w i have back together, i tore it down in hope to build a 393 stroker, unless i can swap these back onto a 302. id prefer the 302 just because of the weight and the well... i never had a problem sticking with the last class i was in using a bone stock 302 non ho against 350s and many 355 sbc's no one beleived me it was a 80,000 mile 302 out of a 85 crown vic. I know a few modified and late model guys that love there ford engines but there very divided on which is the better platform 351w or 302.

Racin Chicken

Reply #27
just updating i got the 5.0 and aod in the 84 bird along with a 5 lug conversion up front and 95 mustang 8.8 rearend with ford racing, springs, global west urethane bushings all the way around camber plates, nylon brake line kit, 16 gallon fuel cell, monroe shocks and struts sensitrac (rules require a stock style shock), 14 point roll cage, and trimmed away about as much sheetmetal as i could possibly get a torch too lol. i will post some pics as soon as i get her painted and lettered

Racin Chicken

Reply #28
have fun and don't wreck the car up to bad if you can but if all else fails go back to tearing up the MN12s.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


http://www.cardomain.com/id/Carpimp1987
1987 T-Bird AEROBIRD-GT had many many mods but is now totaled and is the car that made me want to start customizing everything all over again.
1988 T-Bird 5.0 HO DD/Sleeper/next project car :birdsmily:
1988 Cougar XR7 5.0 HO Vortech Supercharged being bulit right now :cougarsmily:


Racin Chicken

Reply #29
I think you'd be better off with a 650DP carb, the 750 is too big. But then again, you may not need the throttle response and the 750 is slightly easier to tune in it's stock form.
Do you have a carb rule or a carb claimer rule?

Oh, and stick with the 302. Handling is much more important than horsepower.