Skip to main content
Topic: Try This (Read 2620 times) previous topic - next topic

Try This

Reply #15
I don't understand the problems with question 7. That’s one I found easy NOT being able to figure out the "reverse" part. I just skipped "Reverse", and was a no brainer from there, simple process of elimination..

Direct is obviously C
Reduction is obviously A
Overdrive is obviously B

Reverse can ONLY be D... I didn’t understand WHY that one was reverse but it just had to be.
 
19 was one that gave me trouble
:birdsmily:   Objects In Mirror Appear to be Loosing  :birdsmily:

Try This

Reply #16
Quote from: Jim_Miller;182644
I don't understand the problems with question 7. That’s one I found easy NOT being able to figure out the "reverse" part. I just skipped "Reverse", and was a no brainer from there, simple process of elimination..

Direct is obviously C
Reduction is obviously A
Overdrive is obviously B

Reverse can ONLY be D... I didn’t understand WHY that one was reverse but it just had to be.
 
19 was one that gave me trouble


Because "A" reverses the driven gears rotation from it's own and "D" reduces the drive ratio - that's why!
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

Try This

Reply #17
Yeah, I got to #7, saw the ambiguous nature of it..and quit taking the test.

Try This

Reply #18
Quote from: JeremyB;182648
Yeah, I got to #7, saw the ambiguous nature of it..and quit taking the test.


cooch.

:laughing: :slap: :nkhk:

Just kidding ;)
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

Try This

Reply #19
I suppose I am what I eat. :hick:

What does lazy taste like?

Try This

Reply #20
Quote
Reverse can ONLY be D... I didn’t understand WHY that one was reverse but it just had to be.


On diagrams A,B, and C; the driven gear rotates in the opposite direction of the drive gear giving a "forward" momentum.  With the extra cog between the 2 in Diagram D, the driven and drive gears rotate in the same "reverse" direction.
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Try This

Reply #21
Dooohhhhh !!! 80% :(


86' T/C 4.6L DOHC
16' Chebby Cruze 1.4L Turbo
17’ Peterbilt 389 600hp 1850ftlb Trq 18spd

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

“Heavy Metal Mistress”
[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Try This

Reply #22
i got a 78.  , i'm a moron.
91 ranger 2.3 turbo - nowhere near stock
87 thunderbird turbocoupe
06 pontiac g6 gt
:birdsmily:

Try This

Reply #23
I apparently missed most of the questions on lifting pulleys. I was under the impression that each pulley reduced the load by 50%. High school was too  long ago. :(
 
I did get the two "stable/unstable" right.:rolleyes:

Try This

Reply #24
The answer to #31 is 60 kg. Hmm, where do I put that...

Try This

Reply #25
 a 78%
louie  :birdsmily:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]       
My famous last words:
It seemed like a good idea at the time.        88TC R.I.P.      88 Sport build in progress

Try This

Reply #26
76%. I'm stupid...
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Try This

Reply #27
Wow im the dumbest a$$ on here.. I got a 58%. In my defense I was working while I took the test trying to read questions while talking to customers on the phone. No excuse I guess but I feel like a "ASS HAT" Thank you thunderjet...
:ford::oldcougar::mercury:

Try This

Reply #28
Quote from: JeremyB;183012
The answer to #31 is 60 kg. Hmm, where do I put that...


Interesting - you counted the "spaces" and came up with a 5:1 ratio.
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

Try This

Reply #29
Quote from: JeremyB;183012
The answer to #31 is 60 kg. Hmm, where do I put that...


No, the correct answer is 100

300*1=X*3
X=100

edit: i counted each dash as half a unit of measure

they could have illustrated the problem better