Skip to main content
Topic: posting issues (Read 2126 times) previous topic - next topic

posting issues

Reply #15
Quote from: stuntmannick;172859
Can we change the limit to 5 posts a day?


That's a little excessive. Consider it takes 2-3 posts to update the Top 25 and give congratulations out, post a question or 2, hit the ads, and you're already out for the day.

posting issues

Reply #16
honestly, there were more then a couple of tech questions that i tried to reply to, but couldn't because of this lame ass rule.  this is the only forum that i'm on that has this restriction.  i was still able to pm, so i replied to a few posts that way, but this sucks.
91 ranger 2.3 turbo - nowhere near stock
87 thunderbird turbocoupe
06 pontiac g6 gt
:birdsmily:

posting issues

Reply #17
hmmmm
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
1974 maverick lsx powered turbo car SOLD
1973 maverick Tijuana Taxi Tribute
1957 chevy LSX Turbo project (race car)
Owner of Joe Dirt Fabrication

posting issues

Reply #18
Quote from: turboranger91;172736
anyone else ever get this message:

you have exceeded the maximum number of posts (10) in a 1440 minute period.

Quote from: turboranger91;172746
10 posts a day?!  c'mon, all i do is post, this isn't going to work.

Quote from: turboranger91;172791
i didn't mean that fila posted too much, i meant that i can make 10 post in less then an hour. all i do is surf the net at work, so i post a lot.

i don't think that it has anything to do with your average post count, but how many times you post in a 24 hour period.

i may have been registered since last year, but i just started posting within the last month or so.

it's still doing it too. it'll let me post once in a while, but then stop me after i've made one. this sucks. i'm going to have to wait a full day till i can post again. i guess i'll have to pass the time on other forums. :punchballs:

Quote from: turboranger91;172854
i r not post w.  i just have no life.  lol.

Quote from: turboranger91
honestly, there were more then a couple of tech questions that i tried to reply to, but couldn't because of this lame ass rule. this is the only forum that i'm on that has this restriction. i was still able to pm, so i replied to a few posts that way, but this sucks.

So, lemme get this straight. You're told by the board software that you can only post ten times in a 1440 minute period, and you wasted five of them here. That's using 'em wisely...

***********************************************************************************************************************

Here's the poop on the situation:

There has been a new bit of software installed in the hopes of freeing up server load and uncluttering the boards. I searched for ways to streamline the board software because we've been going over our CPU cycles allotment on our server, and we've been having complaints that the board is going to hell in a handbasket because a few "post ws" have been cluttering up just about every thread. This is the best method I found to take care of both problems. I didn't pipe up earlier because I wanted to make sure the script was working.

In addition to some actual tweaks to the board software, this new script operates in the background monitoring things and makes changes as necessary. One of the things it monitors is the amount of CPU bandwidth that individual users are using (making posts is a big CPU hog, bigger than attaching pics or linking to images), and once it picks out users that are using too much it flags them and their posts. Their posts are then checked by a select and anonymous group of people for whether they are relevant to the topic at hand. Users with a high post-per-day count AND a high ratio of irrelevant posts (that is "AND", by the way, not "OR" - more on that in a moment) are flagged as "POST WS" (yes, that is the name of the script) and measures are taken to slow them down.

Note that I said "Post per day" AND "relevance". Users can make as many posts per day as they want, without fear of being flagged a "w", as long as they're relevant. Once you're flagged, though, all posting ability is limited. It's those useless posts like "I wanna buy it but can't afford it" and "I don't have that model car, but if I did I'd want one", and "I don't have any idea what your problem is, but I'm posting in your thread anyway", and "I don't have anything useful to add to this thread, but here's something completely unrelated that I did to MY car" that we pick up on.

That is why I said earlier in this thread to "make 'em count". Consider it "foreshadowing" :D

Also note that this is not an iron-clad rule. This is not a police state in which every post you make has to mean something. Occasional, indeed, even fairly frequent "useless" posts and threads are perfectly OK. It's the ones that seem to make it a career (ie "post w") that the rule takes aim at.

...And another note: It's not permanent. The script "learns" based on percentage of posts marked "Irrelevant". Once you've been flagged it keeps an eye on you for a while. Continue "whoring" and the script tightens the screws. If it "sees" you changing your ways it will gradually lift the restrictions. Go back to your old ways and the script will "w slap" you again.

.......And finally, and perhaps most importantly: PM's are next. Due to numerous complaints of abuse of the PM system (and due to the fact that the whole PM system takes up a LOT of CPU bandwidth) there will soon be a similar script installed to take care of that. Since I'm obviously not going to dictate what can be said in PM's it will simply be a matter of finding those who are sending too many and placing limits on them.

The long and the short of it: We are not trying to single anyone out. There are over 2500 members of this forum and we have got to keep it running as smoothly as possible for everyone. That includes keeping threads uncluttered, limiting "hijacking", and sharing the limited bandwidth.
Any decisions on who becomes a "w" are not taken lightly and are made based on recommendations from the new software and post relevancy. It's high time this board was brought back to "the way it was", and this is the first (and hopefully last) step toward doing so.
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

posting issues

Reply #19
...Im sorry for post whoring lol. I have never heard of such a "problem".
Quote from: EricCoolCats;172858
Well....considering you've made 38 posts since yesterday morning...with the majority of them not containing relative or meaningful content...

*sniff*

Smells like another graduate of the Fila School of Post Whoring™ to me.


:rollin:
"Real cars dont power the front wheels, they lift them"
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
1984 Mercury Cougar GS 5.0:cougarsmily: BBK Equal Length Shorties, BBK O/R X-Pipe, Magnaflow Magnapacks, Mustang GT Stainless Tailpipes, 18" Magnaflow Rolled Edge Tips. Turbo Coupe Hood, Mach 1 Chin Spoiler. 17"x9" Cobra R's, Falken Ziex 255/50s, and 245/45s.
1984 Ford Thunderbird 3.8L "Drag Queen"
2009 Dodge Ram 1500 Lone Star Edition 5.7L Hemi 400hp, lex DOD14M Magnaflow retro-fit ler kit

posting issues

Reply #20
This is a message board, not a chat room.



Thanks for trying to keep the message board running smooth.
"lol.. because not too many people care for that style of car"
[size=-2]Click on paw print \/[/size]