Skip to main content
Topic: they say it cant be done.... (Read 4021 times) previous topic - next topic

they say it cant be done....

Reply #30
Grr...Okay, this REALLY  me off. The whole time I thought they were 19# injectors (because I was told they were, but they aren't). So now I guess I'm going to have to take matters into my own hands...acquire everything I need for an HO conversion and bring the lot to my neighbor to put in. Injectors are easy, but I have no idea what cam and computer I need.

There's a "DC" computer available on eBay (and I have an AOD)...anyone know if that would work, or is a DA1/DB1 required?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
5.0L Speed density
Explorer intake
'92 Mustang GT cam
GT-40 racing heads
Unequal length headers
Custom-made duals
19# injectors
65mm TB
AFPR
T/C header panel
11" brake upgrade
T/C rear sway bar
Electrical mods: too many to list :D

they say it cant be done....

Reply #31
"DC" is listed as a 5.0 T-Bird EEC, possibly what you already have now... Make a list of the Stang 'puters so you'll know what you are looking for...

IF the cam was changed to a SO firing order performance type, there is no EEC that would be correct...

http://fordfuelinjection.com/?p=17  T-Bird listings are about three quarters down the page...

they say it cant be done....

Reply #32
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;292484
"DC" is listed as a 5.0 T-Bird EEC, possibly what you already have now... Make a list of the Stang 'puters so you'll know what you are looking for...

IF the cam was changed to a SO firing order performance type, there is no EEC that would be correct...

http://fordfuelinjection.com/?p=17  T-Bird listings are about three quarters down the page...

I'm inclined to think that a DC computer would work, it looks like the only difference is pin 30.

http://fordfuelinjection.com/files/EFI_harness4.gif

I don't know what NDS means, and I can't even find pin 30 in my EVTM. I've already ordered injectors and I'll snag the "DC" computer. I already have a 65mm TB so that only leaves a cam (I figure that I'll need one). I took a look at Summit, but left thoroughly confused.

Edit: This is a pretty neat dospoogeent on the EEC-IV...apparently it goes to the neutral safety switch, which I have since I have an AOD. This also explains why an AOD Mustang computer won't work if you have a manual trans...no neutral safety switch, so no starting the car.

http://www.merkurencyclopedia.com/EEC-IV/EECTEC10.PDF
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
5.0L Speed density
Explorer intake
'92 Mustang GT cam
GT-40 racing heads
Unequal length headers
Custom-made duals
19# injectors
65mm TB
AFPR
T/C header panel
11" brake upgrade
T/C rear sway bar
Electrical mods: too many to list :D

they say it cant be done....

Reply #33
if you're changing over to HO. the dc would not work. you need a stang or a lincoln computer. with speed density if thats what you're going to keep. auto or manual doesnt really matter as much, people will say one might be a little better then the other though. but as far as mandatory criteria goes, for a HO SD engine you need a computer that operates HO SD functions. theres no way around it.

and the nuetral safety can be grounded or powered (whatever it needs to see, i'm not sure off hand) and bypass. not much to that
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

they say it cant be done....

Reply #34
The DC is a Mustang computer...or am I missing something?

DA1    5.0    87 Mustang    SD-SFI / Manual (see note 1)
DB1    5.0    87 Mustang    SD-SFI / Manual
DC    5.0    Mustang    SD-SFI / Auto
DE    5.0    Mustang    SD-SFI / Auto

This is the computer I picked up:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/87-88-MUSTANG-GT-AUTOMATIC-ECU-COMPUTER-PCM-5-0-DC_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp3286Q2ec0Q2em14QQhashZitem1e57de0190QQitemZ130323186064QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
5.0L Speed density
Explorer intake
'92 Mustang GT cam
GT-40 racing heads
Unequal length headers
Custom-made duals
19# injectors
65mm TB
AFPR
T/C header panel
11" brake upgrade
T/C rear sway bar
Electrical mods: too many to list :D

they say it cant be done....

Reply #35
are you 100% sure it has an aftermarket cam in it? someone pulled a fast one on you with the injectors, maybe they also didnt put a cam in?
Currently Birdless but never Foxless

86 Mustang GT

they say it cant be done....

Reply #36
Quote from: Dougy_Fresh;292508
are you 100% sure it has an aftermarket cam in it? someone pulled a fast one on you with the injectors, maybe they also didnt put a cam in?


I'm not sure of anything anymore...which is why I've decided to get everything I need by myself. I can verify the firing order and the injectors, so they would have to put the cam in.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
5.0L Speed density
Explorer intake
'92 Mustang GT cam
GT-40 racing heads
Unequal length headers
Custom-made duals
19# injectors
65mm TB
AFPR
T/C header panel
11" brake upgrade
T/C rear sway bar
Electrical mods: too many to list :D

they say it cant be done....

Reply #37
Quietleaf, just for shiznits and grins, when you get the eec and injectors, try them with the cam that's in there now, and make sure you wire the distributor for HO-specs.
From what I gather, you have an HO cam (or something akin to that)....
'84 Mustang
'98 Explorer 5.0
'03 Focus, dropped a valve seat. yay. freakin' split port engines...
'06 Explorer EB 4.6

they say it cant be done....

Reply #38
Quote from: Quietleaf;292498
The DC is a Mustang computer...or am I missing something?

DA1    5.0    87 Mustang    SD-SFI / Manual (see note 1)
DB1    5.0    87 Mustang    SD-SFI / Manual
DC    5.0    Mustang    SD-SFI / Auto
DE    5.0    Mustang    SD-SFI / Auto

This is the computer I picked up:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/87-88-MUSTANG-GT-AUTOMATIC-ECU-COMPUTER-PCM-5-0-DC_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp3286Q2ec0Q2em14QQhashZitem1e57de0190QQitemZ130323186064QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories




idk, this is weird. its listed twice. once as a 5.0 bird and again as a mustang. both SD-SFI / Auto. that doesnt make sense
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

they say it cant be done....

Reply #39
Quote from: grutinator;292587
idk, this is weird. its listed twice. once as a 5.0 bird and again as a mustang. both SD-SFI / Auto. that doesnt make sense


Something fishy here. I have the Ford parts PDF and I can't find the part number anywhere, even in the cross-section area. I Googled "e7sf-12a650-c1a" and it looks like no one knows what it is for sure.

And then there's this thread:

http://www.mustangforums.com/forum/5-0-mustang/484790-88-running-rich-2.html

I decided not to screw around and snagged a DA1 computer too. At least that's a known quantity.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
5.0L Speed density
Explorer intake
'92 Mustang GT cam
GT-40 racing heads
Unequal length headers
Custom-made duals
19# injectors
65mm TB
AFPR
T/C header panel
11" brake upgrade
T/C rear sway bar
Electrical mods: too many to list :D

they say it cant be done....

Reply #40
Quote from: Quietleaf;292486

I don't know what NDS means, and I can't even find pin 30 in my EVTM.


NDS is Neutral Drive Switch, tells the EEC if the transmission is in gear or not...

I suppose the DC could be a Stang EEC, guess you have a 50/50 chance...

they say it cant be done....

Reply #41
Quote from: Old_Paint;292130
Being the 'proud owner' of TWO 3.8's with TBI's, and that silly little reservoir down near the MAP, I'll certify the throttle response issue. I've always noticed a slight lag from throttle change to actual response. (Not that I was expecting something neck breaking, just a response, please). I bought one of the two I have brand new in December '85, and from day dot, it's had that lag. Not a huge lag, but a lag, nonetheless. QUOTE]

Told you a while back what the "Lag" was. 

replace or just delete your fuel injector screens.  problem will go away or dinner is on me.

they say it cant be done....

Reply #42
Quote from: Dougy_Fresh;291741
putting a cam in a speed density car without idle surge and poor driveability.

i just put a b303 in my car with a HO computer and it idles perfect. i guess this is just another thing that makes my car a freak.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJS_X3r0eWU



Back to the OP......I have 2 questions.

1) Is the car idling in Park?
2) What is the idle RPM?
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

they say it cant be done....

Reply #43
in that video, yes, it was in park. park/nuetral idle is around 850 and in gear is about 750
Currently Birdless but never Foxless

86 Mustang GT

 

they say it cant be done....

Reply #44
Quote from: jcassity;292633
Quote from: Old_Paint;292130
Being the 'proud owner' of TWO 3.8's with TBI's, and that silly little reservoir down near the MAP, I'll certify the throttle response issue. I've always noticed a slight lag from throttle change to actual response. (Not that I was expecting something neck breaking, just a response, please). I bought one of the two I have brand new in December '85, and from day dot, it's had that lag. Not a huge lag, but a lag, nonetheless. QUOTE]
 
Told you a while back what the "Lag" was.
 
replace or just delete your fuel injector screens. problem will go away or dinner is on me.

The injector screens were stopped up when the car was brand new? That wouldn't speak very well for quality control at the factory. I did do the screen delete, btw, and it made no difference on the one that falls on it's face after it gets to closed loop temperature. (You owe me a dinner. :rollin:) AND, it only seems to do it under light load, i.e. in Drive leaving a light or acclerating from 35 to 45 mph speed zone, etc. NORMAL driving conditions. I've never been able to duplicate the problem in reverse or park when trying to figure out what it might be. The biggest problem I am having is avalibility of active diagnostics equipment when I'm travelling down the road at 30-45 mph. AND, I reiterate a previous objection, if it were clogged injectors, it would be worse at WOT than at light throttle. I have NO technical problem with WOT, only the personal problem of not having two more cylinders out there. At idle, it purrs like a kitten. Until it goes to closed loop, it does not do this. Fouled injectors would create this problem worse under WOT, and the problem would not be mitigated when the engine was cold. If I get on the interstate, and set the cruise on 70, it'll purr all day long between 69 and 73 mph, up and down hills, and NEVER a hesitation. The only thing I can point at there, is an increased air flow across the front of the engine, and this whole time, my problem may be with the dizzy mounted TFI. It is the original TFI on the car from the day I bought it. But by same token, why doesn't it do the same thing when I have it sitting in my driveway after warming it up, and ease down on the throttle?
 
I'm not talking about the severe hesitation problem I have with the blue one in this topic. When the random hesitation doesn't occur with the weird problem, it runs just like the red one. Ever so slight response delay from the time the throttle changes, to the time I can actually feel my intent. BOTH of them do exactly the same thing when I 'blip' the throttle. Not much of anything, other than sound like they're burping the cat. What I hear in the exhaust sounds an awful lot like the TAB or TAD is simply redirecting the air flow from the pump. There is no significant increase in RPM, and yes, I'm mentally compensating for the inertia of the engine and torque converter. This is not a long delay, but noticeable to me. I don't have all the specs for all the components, so doing the math is next to impossible. But, any and every delay due to response of each component and the associated conversions and logic associated with it in the EEC will be spoogeulative. It will never be perfect, but perhaps with super high speed components and a super fast computer, a bit less noticeable. It's old stuff, and was the leading edge of the technology, which has now been rethunk, and better components and computers put in. I can live with that tiny delay I speak of, but that doesn't stop me from noticing it.
:birdsmily:
(X2) '86 Thunderbird, 3.8L CFI, C5 Tranny
 
'92 F-150, 5.0L EFI (SD), M5OD Tranny, 3.08 Dif
 
'70 VW Beetle, 1780cc, twin Solex 43's.