a much better solution than traffic cameras May 22, 2009, 04:44:25 PM Not "family friendly" http://bikesocial.blogspot.com/2009/05/speeding-danish-solution.html#6bkxosmCGTw-1 Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #1 – May 22, 2009, 04:53:10 PM Repost from a long time ago. But not complaining at all.... Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #2 – May 22, 2009, 05:32:54 PM Quote from: tireshredder;273721But not complaining at all....X2 even baby Shameless would agree!!! lol :ies: Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #3 – May 22, 2009, 05:39:11 PM I KNEW there was a better answer than cameras. Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #4 – May 22, 2009, 11:02:29 PM Sorry, didn't realize it was a repost.http://bikesocial.blogspot.com/2009/05/controlling-speeding-denmark.htmlwoops, did it again. Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #5 – May 22, 2009, 11:10:33 PM I DARE you to do that again !!!!!!!! Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #6 – May 23, 2009, 01:56:46 PM Okay, but do you "double dirty dog" dare me?http://bikesocial.blogspot.com/2009/05/controlling-speeding-denmark.htmloops. slippery paste. Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #7 – May 23, 2009, 02:09:50 PM You really are on the edge.LOL. Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #8 – May 23, 2009, 06:43:09 PM Quote from: t3skidoo;273863Okay, but do you "double dirty dog" dare me?TRIPLE dog dare you!! :shakeass: Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #9 – May 24, 2009, 03:41:17 AM Gotta love the Europeans.... I would have a good excuse for speeding now though too."I cant look at the speed limit s when my girlfriend is in the car. She doesnt find them as useful as I do."That a win all around. I vote yes. On a side note. In Northern VA (Fairfax area) they outlawed the cameras because it was "invasion of privacy" since they could see into your car. All it takes is money and you can fight anything.Thing is tint limits would be like telling someone that they cannot hang blinds and drapes because it blocks the view in and out of the glass.*IF* you where to compare the two. ies make me smile:ies::ies::ies: Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #10 – May 24, 2009, 03:58:52 AM Quote from: DVP;274005Gotta love the Europeans.... I would have a good excuse for speeding now though too."I cant look at the speed limit s when my girlfriend is in the car. She doesnt find them as useful as I do."That a win all around. I vote yes. On a side note. In Northern VA (Fairfax area) they outlawed the cameras because it was "invasion of privacy" since they could see into your car. All it takes is money and you can fight anything.Thing is tint limits would be like telling someone that they cannot hang blinds and drapes because it blocks the view in and out of the glass.*IF* you where to compare the two. ies make me smile:ies::ies::ies:Except you don't drive your house down the middle of the road, at least unless your worse off then me. Out here there really strict on tint. None at all unless from the factory on the front windows and windsheild. And money isn't the answer for everything. There was a guy that got sued for renting a room in his house saying for one or two adults. He got sued for being discriminitory to kids. He fought the $500 and ended up paying $40,000 to get it thrown out. Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #11 – May 24, 2009, 04:12:35 AM Quote from: Haystack;274007Except you don't drive your house down the middle of the road, at least unless your worse off then me. Out here there really strict on tint. None at all unless from the factory on the front windows and windsheild. And money isn't the answer for everything. There was a guy that got sued for renting a room in his house saying for one or two adults. He got sued for being discriminitory to kids. He fought the $500 and ended up paying $40,000 to get it thrown out.But someone could be getting attacked in the house and no one could see. Its a stupid comparison but people could and might fight it because they can.True money isnt always the answer, usually the problem actually. In the camera case it was about money though. Upper class area, many lawyer residents, and being close to D.C. Politicians too. They had the money to fight it and they did. Around me, we just accept it and pay our tickets. Even if we wanted to fight it we couldnt afford to. Quote Selected
[heads off to fridge] Reply #12 – May 24, 2009, 04:49:12 PM Quote from: gumby;273904TRIPLE dog dare you!! no way man, not without some liquid courage Quote Selected
a much better solution than traffic cameras Reply #13 – May 25, 2009, 01:53:44 AM Quote from: DVP;274012But someone could be getting attacked in the house and no one could see. Its a stupid comparison but people could and might fight it because they can.True money isnt always the answer, usually the problem actually. In the camera case it was about money though. Upper class area, many lawyer residents, and being close to D.C. Politicians too. They had the money to fight it and they did. Around me, we just accept it and pay our tickets. Even if we wanted to fight it we couldnt afford to.You don't have to pay alot of money to go to court. Just a really flexible job or the time to go. You don't have to pay anyone to represent you anymore then you have to pay a mechanic to work on your car. But the choice is up to you. Quote Selected
Topic: a much better solution than traffic cameras (Read 1137 times)
previous topic - next topic
