Skip to main content
Topic: FPR question... (Read 1429 times) previous topic - next topic

FPR question...

Swapping to 5.0HO.
Can I plug the 19lbs in along with the computer and use the orignial FPR?

FPR question...

Reply #1
Yes.
Project 3G: Grandpa Grocery Getter-'85 Crown Vic LTD 2-door, 351W with heavily ported/polished GT40 heads, heavily ported/polished Typhoon Power Plus upper & lower intake, Comp Cams 265DEH retarded 1*, FAST EZ-EFI, HD T5, 8.8" 3.73 trac lock with extra clutches, 3G alt. swap, '99 CVPI front brakes, '09 CVPI rear disc brakes, '00 CVPI booster&m/c + wilwood adj prop valve.

Parted & Gone-'88 T-bird Sport, 351W swap, ported GT40 heads

FPR question...

Reply #2
Yep I'm running my stock SO one no prob.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

FPR question...

Reply #3
Same part as HO
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

FPR question...

Reply #4
Sweet :hick:
She's even closer to running now.
Me and my uncle have a date in 2 weeks for the track.
Camaro Vs. Cougar

FPR question...

Reply #5
what kind of camaro?
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

FPR question...

Reply #6
1968 RS with a 350, nothing special...

FPR question...

Reply #7
Quote from: 88XR7;194437
1968 RS with a 350, nothing special...


Stockish  HO 5.0??? If so and the Camero is running anywhere as it should, plan on getting your ass whipped...

FPR question...

Reply #8
Many different levels of the 350.  Many different rear end combos back then too...  My buddy has a 350 auto with 2.43's out baack.  Runs perfect, but slow.
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

FPR question...

Reply #9
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;194514
Stockish  HO 5.0??? If so and the Camero is running anywhere as it should, plan on getting your ass whipped...

;-)

The 350 is not the original motor, RS never came with a 350 for the 68 model year. My brother ran the numbers for my uncle while they were doing work and it turns out to be a 175hp~ish corvette sourced 350.

I know he won't get his one-wheel-peel off the line in front of the Cat with 265s and a locker.

FPR question...

Reply #10
265's are alot of tire for only 220 at the crank, figure 190 at the wheels just for the sake of using numbers and rough guesses. i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's. there is too much of a good thing sometimes, you know?
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

FPR question...

Reply #11
Quote from: grutinator;194561
265's are alot of tire for only 220 at the crank, figure 190 at the wheels just for the sake of using numbers and rough guesses. i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's. there is too much of a good thing sometimes, you know?


I COMPLETELY agree with you.
...but, the tires are in great condition with alot of life left. I could not beat the deal for 2 wheeles/tires for $40. I wanted an extra set of wheels for something stickier on down the road, but these were a plus.

Quote from: grutinator;194561
i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's.

I think that would point more in the department of torque.

|

Now that I think of it, I just might do a test on times/traction with air filled Vs. Nitrogen filled.:hick:
Then I will test prepped Vs. non-prepped street tires more then I already have.
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/09/28/Tampabay/Nitrogen_in_your_tire.shtml

I LOVE the last sentence in that article, it's what I always tell people who skimp on tires:D

FPR question...

Reply #12
Quote from: grutinator;194561
i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's.

I think that would point more in the department of torque.

FPR question...

Reply #13
Quote from: V8Demon;194536
Many different levels of the 350.  Many different rear end combos back then too...  My buddy has a 350 auto with 2.43's out baack.  Runs perfect, but slow.


Yeah in the 70s, but no '68 ever had 2.43s... Maybe 2.91(or similar), but I'm figuring a R/S had at least 3.23s

And no 3.50??? Probably more R/Ss had 350s than any other engine...

 

FPR question...

Reply #14
It's a '69.  The build sheet says 2.43's.  Original owner was 24 years old at date of purchase from dealership in Nassau County New York.  Sorry, I should have specified it was a '69.
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!