FPR question... December 25, 2007, 12:21:50 AM Swapping to 5.0HO.Can I plug the 19lbs in along with the computer and use the orignial FPR? Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #2 – December 25, 2007, 12:44:37 AM Yep I'm running my stock SO one no prob. Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #4 – December 25, 2007, 02:50:48 PM Sweet :hick:She's even closer to running now.Me and my uncle have a date in 2 weeks for the track.Camaro Vs. Cougar Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #6 – December 25, 2007, 09:10:41 PM 1968 RS with a 350, nothing special... Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #7 – December 26, 2007, 12:30:09 PM Quote from: 88XR7;1944371968 RS with a 350, nothing special...Stockish HO 5.0??? If so and the Camero is running anywhere as it should, plan on getting your ass whipped... Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #8 – December 26, 2007, 04:29:49 PM Many different levels of the 350. Many different rear end combos back then too... My buddy has a 350 auto with 2.43's out baack. Runs perfect, but slow. Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #9 – December 26, 2007, 04:55:06 PM Quote from: TurboCoupe50;194514Stockish HO 5.0??? If so and the Camero is running anywhere as it should, plan on getting your ass whipped...;-)The 350 is not the original motor, RS never came with a 350 for the 68 model year. My brother ran the numbers for my uncle while they were doing work and it turns out to be a 175hp~ish corvette sourced 350.I know he won't get his one-wheel-peel off the line in front of the Cat with 265s and a locker. Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #10 – December 26, 2007, 07:56:40 PM 265's are alot of tire for only 220 at the crank, figure 190 at the wheels just for the sake of using numbers and rough guesses. i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's. there is too much of a good thing sometimes, you know? Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #11 – December 27, 2007, 02:44:58 AM Quote from: grutinator;194561265's are alot of tire for only 220 at the crank, figure 190 at the wheels just for the sake of using numbers and rough guesses. i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's. there is too much of a good thing sometimes, you know?I COMPLETELY agree with you....but, the tires are in great condition with alot of life left. I could not beat the deal for 2 wheeles/tires for $40. I wanted an extra set of wheels for something stickier on down the road, but these were a plus.Quote from: grutinator;194561i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's.I think that would point more in the department of torque.|Now that I think of it, I just might do a test on times/traction with air filled Vs. Nitrogen filled.:hick:Then I will test prepped Vs. non-prepped street tires more then I already have.http://www.sptimes.com/2005/09/28/Tampabay/Nitrogen_in_your_tire.shtmlI LOVE the last sentence in that article, it's what I always tell people who skimp on tires:D Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #12 – December 27, 2007, 02:46:00 AM Quote from: grutinator;194561i would begin to worry about trying to get all that tire rotating, alot more rotating mass then 245's.I think that would point more in the department of torque. Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #13 – December 27, 2007, 07:51:47 AM Quote from: V8Demon;194536Many different levels of the 350. Many different rear end combos back then too... My buddy has a 350 auto with 2.43's out baack. Runs perfect, but slow.Yeah in the 70s, but no '68 ever had 2.43s... Maybe 2.91(or similar), but I'm figuring a R/S had at least 3.23sAnd no 3.50??? Probably more R/Ss had 350s than any other engine... Quote Selected
FPR question... Reply #14 – December 27, 2007, 08:12:27 AM It's a '69. The build sheet says 2.43's. Original owner was 24 years old at date of purchase from dealership in Nassau County New York. Sorry, I should have specified it was a '69. Quote Selected