Skip to main content
Topic: roller vs. flat tappet (Read 1433 times) previous topic - next topic

roller vs. flat tappet

im pricing out parts for the 351 project i'm starting and it has come to my attention that converting it to roller lifters is WAY more expensive then keeping it flat tappet. i dont have much expirience with flat tappet lifters, what makes rollers so much more desirable? are flat tappets more noisy? dramatic power difference? way more wear on the cam? i realize rollers are better, but are they really $300 better? i got a feeling im gonna go oldschool tech on this project.
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #1
the main difference is less friction and a more aggressive ramp.
louie  :birdsmily:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]       
My famous last words:
It seemed like a good idea at the time.        88TC R.I.P.      88 Sport build in progress

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #2
Spend the extra and go roller, other than the reasons stated above, you'll never have to worry about wear on the camshaft as there isn't any with rollers

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #3
If you can find a '94 or newer block (F4 casting) it'll already be roller
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #4
I would go roller. The biggest difference is of course friction that is only oudone by the fact of the valves open nd close much faster. That allows the valve to be open longer during the stroke. Huge difference.

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #5
If it helps, I'm building a flat tappet motor right now.  It's not fancy but it'll be a stout 302.  It's the best I can do for my budget.  Cams are alot cheaper for a flat tappet motor.
84 TC 302 -5.0L/t5/7.5 locking rear and a 3.45 gear, Edelbrock Intake, Aluminum Heads, Edlebrock 65mm Throttlebody, Edlebrock Cam, 24lb injectors & MAS Air Sensor calibrated via chip,  BBK headers, Catback H pipe, Magnaflow lers :evilgrin:
:pics-stfu:

 Project Thread with pics

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #6
^ I'm getting ready to do the same. It all depends on how much money you want to spend IMHO. I'd love a roller block, but I have flat tappet. Hence.... a new flat tappet cam

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #7
well, obviously the less money spent is better. any ideas whats the biggest lift and duration i can go in a 351w with flat tappet? i realize with roller its almost the sky's the limit. but if i can still run a pretty radical cam with flat, maybe i'll just do that. cus not only do i have to get conversion lifters, which are alot more, but i also gotta get a roller cam, which is a little more expencive but not bad. the conversion lifters worry me the most.
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #8
Don't forget about springs!
84 TC 302 -5.0L/t5/7.5 locking rear and a 3.45 gear, Edelbrock Intake, Aluminum Heads, Edlebrock 65mm Throttlebody, Edlebrock Cam, 24lb injectors & MAS Air Sensor calibrated via chip,  BBK headers, Catback H pipe, Magnaflow lers :evilgrin:
:pics-stfu:

 Project Thread with pics

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #9
Flat tappet cams were only used for 75+ years prior to the rollers, not a big deal... We ain't talking wild RACE ONLY cams here, valve opening/closing events are going to similar on flat & roller street cams...

If you had the block that's another story, but converting one ain't worth the money IMO...

Tom

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #10
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;178610
Flat tappet cams were only used for 75+ years prior to the rollers, not a big deal... We ain't talking wild RACE ONLY cams here, valve opening/closing events are going to similar on flat & roller street cams...
 
If you had the block that's another story, but converting one ain't worth the money IMO...
 
Tom

X1+  Flat's are fine ,sometimes safer.
Old Grey Cat to this.88 Cat, 5.0 HO, CW mounts, mass air, CI custom cam, afr165's, Tmoss worked cobra intake, BBK shorty's,off road h pipe, magnaflow ex. T-5,spec stage 2 clutch, 8.8 373 TC trac loc, che ajustables with bullits on the rear. 11" brakes up front. +

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #11
+2

If it's a flat tappet block keep it. You really won't notice a huge gain by going to a roller if both cams have the same specs.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #12
thanks guys, that mostly what i was wondering, if there were any huge dissadvantages. seems like flats are the way to go. there was good bit of sticker shock when i saw the price of conversion kits. thanks again

-keith
1988 Thunderbird sport
2004 Ford F150 Lariat
2008  Chevrolet Cobalt Sport
2007 Suzuki DR-Z400S dual sport/Supermoto
1988 Thunderbird LX - sold
1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7 with GST kit - gone

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #13
Quote from: grutinator;178718
thanks guys, that mostly what i was wondering, if there were any huge dissadvantages. seems like flats are the way to go. there was good bit of sticker shock when i saw the price of conversion kits. thanks again

-keith


sticker shock aint the words for it, its highway robbery.  They have roller anything for just about any older blocks / heads. you just gotta pay.

 

roller vs. flat tappet

Reply #14
Quote from: jcassity;179025
sticker shock aint the words for it, its highway robbery.  They have roller anything for just about any older blocks / heads. you just gotta pay.


Serriously why the hell are the retro-fit lifter kits sooooo expensive? All the lifter has extra is a tie bar:hick:
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.