Skip to main content
Topic: Monte Carlo SS (Read 2165 times) previous topic - next topic

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #15
Quote
The idea of making their cars look about the same is not something new though. I think all manufacturers do it to an extent to help make all of their cars look like they are from the same family.


The Camaro and Firebird (from their beginning to current)
Late 70's:  Oldsmobile Regency and Caddy Coupe DeVille
Early 80's:  Chevy Caprice and Pontiac Parisienne
......and the list goes on and on....Case in point OUR CARS;)
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #16
It looks like arse....
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #17
Quote
The GTO is kinda neat, but overpriced with blah styling.


Spoken by someone who has never driven one, obviously.  ;)
-Jim
1987 Cougar LS 5.0


Monte Carlo SS

Reply #18
Quote from: Paul Flockhart
The Camaro and Firebird (from their beginning to current)


Actually I always thought the Camaro and Firebird were pretty different looking over the years, for cars that both shared the exact same platform. On the last generation, the only thing between the two cars that was really exactly the same was the roofline :dunno:

And no, I haven't driven a GTO, but they still look way too much like a Grand Prix. I've also seen the concept sketches of the next generation GTO, which looks like a mitsubishi galant :bs:

Garrett H.
'94 F250 XLT- 4x4, 5 speed, 7.3 IDI Turbo Diesel, 4" intake, 4" exhaust, 5" turnout stacks, manual hubs, etc.
'87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
Engine, wheels, tires, etc!
Exhaust sound clip
Another clip

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #19
Quote from: Red_LX
Actually I always thought the Camaro and Firebird were pretty different looking over the years, for cars that both shared the exact same platform. On the last generation, the only thing between the two cars that was really exactly the same was the roofline :dunno:

And no, I haven't driven a GTO, but they still look way too much like a Grand Prix. I've also seen the concept sketches of the next generation GTO, which looks like a mitsubishi galant :bs:


I don't if it was you who posted this in another thread, but those weren't pontiac concept sketches. They were illustrations (and shoddy, poor quality, hack skill ones at that) made by a magazine on what they think the next GTO could look like. I'd put as much stock in that as I would an icebox company in the arctic circle.

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #20
Most cars now don't really appeal to me. I think that some of the last good designs to come out of Detroit were the aero Fox Birds and Cougars. There are still some nice cars being made (ie 300C, Mustang, Fusion, Charger) but most of the cars that come out just suck in the styling department. Of course I think that the late 60's-early 70's cars were some of the best designs to come out of Detroit. I'm only 20 and I couldn't give a rats ass about most of the cars that come out today. Mabey I'm just old fashioned;)
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #21
Quote from: 5.0willgo
The idea of making their cars look about the same is not something new though. I think all manufacturers do it to an extent to help make all of their cars look like they are from the same family. Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Dodge and even Ford all do it. Have you noticed that the front of the Ford trucks no matter if it's an Escape or a full size truck look about the same in the front? Or that about every Dodge has the cross hair grill? They've done this since cars started being designed and manufacturers wanted to distinguish themselves from one another.


But then you look at the cobalt a econo can of a car then look at the monte a nice car this in my mind brings down the value of the monte and brings up the value of the cobalt.

Say you walk into the dealer and see them sitting side by side. Why pay for the style of the monte when the cobalt looks like it only smaller.

But thats the way I see it.

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #22
Quote from: slamedcat
But then you look at the cobalt a econo can of a car then look at the monte a nice car this in my mind brings down the value of the monte and brings up the value of the cobalt.

Say you walk into the dealer and see them sitting side by side. Why pay for the style of the monte when the cobalt looks like it only smaller.

But thats the way I see it.


I see that. I got you. The same applies to say a Ford Five Hundred and a Focus along with a ton of others.

 

Monte Carlo SS

Reply #23
I am not impressed with any new car on the road right now.  Not one.  Well the new mustangs are nice.
One 88