Poor basterized bird December 31, 2009, 07:52:30 PM Seen this on ebay,what a hack job.Street strip car,i think not.You just could not drive this thing on the street,spool,manual brakes and rack,what was he thinking.I love the shelving rack holding up the fuel cell,OMG.And he was gonna put a chev in it,ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-Thunderbird-turbo-coupe-1987-Thunderbird-turbo-coupe-low-reserve_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4a9d6b68eeQQitemZ320468642030QQptZUSQ5fCarsQ5fTrucks Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #2 – December 31, 2009, 09:34:43 PM All that work, time, and money for the rear end, and yet it still has the stock suspension? Fail.:flame: Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #4 – December 31, 2009, 11:08:37 PM That's only about 60-70 miles from me. If anyone wants me to check it out for them before they bid, I would be happy to. Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #5 – December 31, 2009, 11:50:45 PM good start for a race car. Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #6 – January 01, 2010, 11:09:27 AM Quote from: dominator;304676You just could not drive this thing on the street,spool,manual brakes and rack,meh, i know plenty of guys who drive their weekend cars with manual steering, brakes, and a spool. one of which is a high 9sec 75 camaro on pump gas. weighs more than my TC and drives it every weekend in the summer.Quote from: SLEEPER T-BIRD 87;304700good start for a race car.if the reserve is actually low, i would agree......if you like that kinda racing :hick: Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #7 – January 01, 2010, 11:31:26 AM Manual racks prolly fine with that light front end and skinniest. Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #8 – January 01, 2010, 01:55:05 PM The only time a manual rack sucks is in low speed turns, ie parallel parking. My old 89 GT had a poor man's manual rack (recirc the lines). Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #9 – January 01, 2010, 04:33:14 PM I just don't see a problem ...And I dont see the problem with putting a chevy engine in a ford ... Just brand-British cigarettes who hates it ...I like that car but ofcourse some things I would change! Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #10 – January 01, 2010, 08:10:13 PM thats just ugly. maybe its the yellow. or maybe its that retarded bird catcher that has no purpose. as i was looking at the pictures theres only one that i thought.. not bad. the rims. love that style of rim, but he can keep them, and the car, and burn it to the ground. i know i know dont kill a bird. but that killed that car already. burn it to the gorund after taking the tailights off. Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #11 – January 01, 2010, 09:42:42 PM Quote from: jandmmustangs;304749 My old 89 GT had a poor man's manual rack (recirc the lines).A true manual rack will be easier to turn than that Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #12 – January 01, 2010, 10:13:43 PM Quote from: SLEEPER T-BIRD 87;304700good start for a race car.I agree, but I wouldn't go to Minnesota for it if he was giving it away... Quote Selected
Poor basterized bird Reply #13 – January 01, 2010, 10:37:35 PM Especially tonight. Hands might get cold touching the chain binders, lol. Quote Selected
Topic: Poor basterized bird (Read 1462 times)
previous topic - next topic
