Windsor engine relations April 01, 2008, 04:38:10 PM Are the 3.8/4.2L (FTBC, Mustang, F150, Windstar, Freestar) in any way related to the 5.0L (Is the block + or - 2 cylinder's difference?). Fead, waterpump, timing chain cover, cylinder-to-cylinder spacing)... is there anything common? Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #1 – April 01, 2008, 07:28:45 PM There ford moters,is this a trick ??? Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #2 – April 01, 2008, 08:20:29 PM The engines are very loosely related, but to my knowledge no parts interchange, save for maybe the rocker arms and the fact that they have the same bell housing pattern (RWD only). I've read that the Ford 3.8 is more similar in design to the Buick 3.8 than it is to the Ford Windsor engines... Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #3 – April 01, 2008, 09:10:14 PM Quote from: kitzdnm;212055There ford moters,is this a trick ???As in brothers TE and FO Ford? Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #4 – April 01, 2008, 10:26:21 PM They are virtually no relation to a Windsor, as Carmen stated it's been compared to the 231 Buick V6(cept the Buick is a better engine)... Would have been too easy to follow Chevrolet's(and Buick) lead and design the 3.8 after a existing V8 engine...Bore spacing 4.193 vs 4.380 for the Windsors...Deck height 9.232 vs 8.206(5.0) or 9.503(5.The dimensions for all Ford engines from the FE up, are in the Ford Racing catalogs... Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #5 – April 01, 2008, 11:12:25 PM IIRC the 3.8 is an Esshag engine, and obviously the Windsor is a Windsor, starting with the 221 in 1962. Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #6 – April 01, 2008, 11:49:23 PM Quote from: HAVI;212116IIRC the 3.8 is an Esshag engine, and obviously the Windsor is a Windsor, starting with the 221 in 1962.Ah, that's right. That's where I went wrong. They're neighboring towns. Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #7 – April 01, 2008, 11:49:47 PM Quote from: TurboCoupe50;212102They are virtually no relation to a Windsor, as Carmen stated it's been compared to the 231 Buick V6(cept the Buick is a better engine)... Would have been too easy to follow Chevrolet's(and Buick) lead and design the 3.8 after a existing V8 engine...Bore spacing 4.193 vs 4.380 for the Windsors...Deck height 9.232 vs 8.206(5.0) or 9.503(5.The dimensions for all Ford engines from the FE up, are in the Ford Racing catalogs...Thanks Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #8 – April 02, 2008, 04:55:26 PM Quote from: HAVI;212116IIRC the 3.8 is an Esshag engine, and obviously the Windsor is a Windsor, starting with the 221 in 1962.But did you know in the 60s the small blocks were also built in Cleveland??? At that time they were known just as "small blocks"... Only when the 351 Cleveland was introduced was it necessary to have a distinction between the two 351s... AFAIK, Cleveland and Windsor kept building 302s for several years... Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #9 – April 02, 2008, 05:59:20 PM http://www.babpen 15s.com/editorial/ar/ar90134.htmPerhaps that link there will give you a little insight to the history and design of the 3.8 ford motor and its variations over the years Quote Selected
Windsor engine relations Reply #10 – April 08, 2008, 05:07:29 PM Excellent information regarding the 3.8's roots. http://v6power.net/vb/showthread.php?t=34909 Quote Selected
Topic: Windsor engine relations (Read 1934 times)
previous topic - next topic
