Anyone read the article by David Freiburger on the future of hot rodding?
My take on his opinion did not relate to the future of Hot Rodding. I understood his argument of old (already build) cars having less of an environmental impact than the energy needed to build new ones. But that's not really a new point of view, it's been around since California established a Cash for Clunkers law years ago. Does it make it any less valid? Within his stated argument no. A point which could be added though, is: The average age of the automotive fleet in the US on the road today is the oldest in history. IMO this indicates there a lot of cars which are in need of replacement.