460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? March 18, 2009, 10:39:29 PM Will this work i want to know for my next junkyard build!!!! Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #1 – March 18, 2009, 10:44:58 PM i heard it works???? Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #2 – March 19, 2009, 01:53:57 AM no. Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #3 – March 19, 2009, 01:59:58 AM the 3.8's have the same style of rockers as a stock 5.0. I am not sure if they would bolt up with no problems, but I would bet they could. Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #4 – March 19, 2009, 02:09:52 AM OVERALL DURATION will not be affected.If you were to measure the durtion @ .050" and .200" you would notice a slight increase in duration at those--and all other intervals--where the valve is actually off the seat. Increase in overall duration? NOIncrease in potential air intake/exhaust charge within the same given time range? Yes. Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #5 – March 19, 2009, 05:42:02 AM Big block chevys and the 460 rockers will interchange, and so will the guide plates. Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #6 – March 19, 2009, 10:57:34 AM Just wanted more rocker ratio from 1.6 to 1.73 is the difference i think??? Im slapping a 5.0 ho together with new rings,bearings,ect out of my used parts and gonna throw some nos at it. So kinda piecen stuff together. Gonna port n polish some e-7s today for it.Ten see how long she can handle and how much??? LOL Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #7 – March 19, 2009, 11:10:17 AM Here's an illustration of what I hopefully put into words before: Quote Selected
460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? Reply #8 – March 19, 2009, 11:29:11 AM I have clevland pedestal mount rockers 1.73 they should be same as 460 correct. And overall is this work messing with??? Quote Selected
Topic: 460 rockers 1.7 in 302 for more duration??? (Read 1647 times)
previous topic - next topic
