Skip to main content
Topic: Is this just wrong? (Read 2000 times) previous topic - next topic

Is this just wrong?

Reply #1
Well, they certainly didn't make the ugly shager any worse than factory. Of course i'm biased, those pieces of shiznits were never a Thunderbird beyond name anyhow..
'84 Mustang
'98 Explorer 5.0
'03 Focus, dropped a valve seat. yay. freakin' split port engines...
'06 Explorer EB 4.6

Is this just wrong?

Reply #2
Yeah agreed.  That thing is Fugly, and she wasnt pretty to start with.

Is this just wrong?

Reply #3
Oh. Its worse than factory.  Those were ugly to begin with, but .... that is BAD.
Mike

Is this just wrong?

Reply #4
Apparently it was worth 27 bids on it. Ugly car.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..


Is this just wrong?

Reply #6
Yup, but the last generation tbirds were basically reskinned jaguars and had a 3.9 v-8.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

 

Is this just wrong?

Reply #7
While I certainly don't hold the last generation Tbirds in the same regard as the fox Tbirds I thought they were attractive and cleanly styled and would be a nice cruiser.  This one however is awful!